Abstract 173P
Background
This retrospective multicenter real-world study aims to compare outcomes reached by L and S second-line therapy in HCC patients treated with first-line AB.
Methods
The overall cohort included 891 HCC patients from five countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and the Republic of Korea) treated with AB in first-line setting between October 2018 and April 2022. A total of 472 (53.0%) patients had progressive disease after first-line therapy, of which 243 (51.5%) received a second-line treatment. Data from 137 patients were available for the analysis: 51 (37.2%) received S and 86 (62.8%) L.
Results
L second-line subgroup achieved a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.9 months, significative longer (p = 0.01; HR: 2.24) compared to S subgroup that reached a mOS of 14.3 months. After adjusting for positive clinical covariates at univariate analysis, multivariate analysis highlighted Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) 1 grade [p < 0.01; hazard ratio (HR): 5.23] and L second-line therapy (p = 0.01; HR: 2.18) as positive prognostic factor for OS. Forest plot highlighted a positive trend in terms of OS in favor of patients treated with L second-line regardless of baseline characteristics before first-line therapy. In particular, L second-line subgroup had a better OS compared to S second-line subgroup in male patients, aged ≤ 70 years, with viral etiology, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C stage, αfetoprotein < 400 ng/mL, Child-Pugh A, NLR < 3, ALBI 1 grade, performance status ≤ 1, presence of portal vein thrombosis. Regarding first-line treatment outcomes, L second-line subgroup achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 3.5 months, while S second-line subgroup reached a mPFS of 4.3 months without any significative difference (p 0.42; HR: 1.15). There was no difference in overall response rate (L 26.1% vs. S 19.8%; p = 0.29) and disease control rate (L 76.8% vs. S 66.4%; p = 0.71) between the two subgroups.
Conclusions
L second-line therapy is superior to S in HCC patients progressed to first-line AB.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
298P - Managing locally advanced cervical cancer: Insights from a tertiary care center and a 3-year follow-up on outcomes
Presenter: Ambedkar Yadala
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
299P - Sexual dysfunction assessment in longterm survivors of carcinoma cervix using LENT SOMA scale
Presenter: Niharika Sethi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
300P - Assessing ovarian function in Vietnamese cervical cancer patients who underwent ovary transposition prior to pelvic radiation therapy
Presenter: Cuong Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
301P - Correlation between cervical cancer recurrence after radiation therapy and vaginal microbiome
Presenter: Xiaoxian Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
302P - Expression of ERCC4 gene and its correlation with clinical and pathological parameters in cervical cancer
Presenter: Himanshu Mishra
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
303P - Prognostic value of body composition and systemic inflammatory markers in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer following chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Hui Guo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
305P - A real-world multicenter cohort study of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEM) in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer: Interim analysis of GOGO-EM4 study
Presenter: Yoshikazu Nagase
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
306P - Adjuvant treatment and impact on relapse in stage IA uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas: A single center retrospective study
Presenter: Sachin Khurana
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
307P - Hormonal therapy vs combination chemotherapy in metastatic leiomyosarcomas: A systematic review
Presenter: Patricia Angel
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
309P - Expression of estrogen receptor is a negative predictive biomarker for immunotherapy with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer with pMMR
Presenter: Hiroyuki Fujii
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract