Abstract 611P
Background
The ESMO-MCBS provides a standardized assessment of the clinical benefit of a study treatment, considering factors such as overall survival and quality of life. We examined the profile of scores for trials of adjuvant therapy or potentially curative therapies presented at ASCO22 to assess the applicability of the MCBS.
Methods
Abstracts and prior or subsequent (until April 10, 2023) full publications of phase 3 trials on adjuvant therapy or curative treatment presented at ASCO22 were assessed using the MCBS v1.1 evaluation form 1. Scores were calculated based on overall survival, disease free survival or pathological complete response data and graded as A, B or C. Grades A and B indicate a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. Two independent reviewers performed the grading; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus with a third investigator.
Results
Thirty-five trials were evaluated, of which 11 could not be scored due to insufficient data or endpoint not gradable of the remaining 24 trials, 12 could not be graded due to statistically non-significant results. The remaining 12 trials were scored based on abstract alone (n= 6), or subsequent publication (n=6). A meaningful clinical benefit was seen in 11 of 12 trials (92%) with a score of A (n=9) or B (n=2), whereas 1 study had a score C.
Conclusions
Applying the current ESMO-MCBS to adjuvant and curative phase 3 trials presented at ASCO22 has significant limitations, due to the number of trials not able to be scored. This is a particular problem for studies with non-significant results. Adapting the score to allow grading of all trials may better assist clinicians and patients to assess the value of contemporary research.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Segelov: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ESMO-MCBS Working Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
441P - The prophylactic efficacy of telpegfilgrastim, a Y-shape branched pegylated G-CSF in patient with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: A multicenter, randomized phase III study
Presenter: Xinshuai Wang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
442P - Negative impact on bone homeostasis in postmenopausal women with non-metastatic breast cancer during cytotoxic chemotherapy
Presenter: Yadav Nisha
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
443P - Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in overall survival of cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Visakha Irawan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
444P - Commencing a nurse led symptom and urgent review clinic (SURC) in a Victorian regional cancer centre
Presenter: Sue Bartlett
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
445P - Self-reported symptom burden, quality of life and unmet need of symptom management in nasopharyngeal cancer survivors: A cross-sectional survey
Presenter: Jerry Ching
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
446P - A single center experience of anamorelin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Takanori Ito
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
447P - Quality of life in patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer receiving gefitinib vs gefitinib plus pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy
Presenter: Nandini Menon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
448P - Association of clinicopathological characteristics and pro-inflammatory markers with reduced relative dose intensity in breast cancer chemotherapy
Presenter: Susanna Hutajulu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
449P - Psychometric validation of the MD Anderson symptom inventory head&neck module: Chinese version in nasopharyngeal cancer survivors
Presenter: Victor Tam
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
450P - Retrospective study of anamorelin therapy for unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer with cancer cachexia
Presenter: Mao Okada
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract