Abstract 182P
Background
Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) with peritoneal carcinomatosis is associated with poor prognosis with median overall survival surfacing under the one-year mark. The treatment of gastric cancer remains controversial. Using hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in combination with cytoreductive surgery may help reduce mortality rates. This study attempted to investigate treatment modalities available for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.
Methods
We extracted all adult patients with intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma with 7th edition AJCC M1 stage (2010-2015) using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with extra-peritoneal metastasis were excluded. We stratified patients into four different groups: surgery, chemotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy, and no surgery/no chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression models were utilized to access overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
Results
A total of 243 patients were identified. The median (OS) of the entire cohort was 11 months. Patients who received both chemotherapy and surgery, chemotherapy alone, and surgery alone had higher median (OS) compared to no treatment [19, 13, and 6 months, respectively, vs 3 months, p<0.001], as well as a higher (CSS) (p<0.0001). Patients who received no therapy had a statistically significant risk of overall mortality compared to the chemotherapy and surgery group [HR= 9.28 (5.40 -15.94). p<0.001], and compared to other treatment groups (p<0.001). N3B Stage was a significant risk factor for (OS) and (CSS) [HR= 2.69 (1.23 -5.78), p<0.013]. Table: 182P
Median overall survival
N | Events | Median survival | 95% CI | |
Overall Survival (OS) | ||||
No treatment administered | 56 | 54 | 3 | (2- 5) |
Chemotherapy alone | 91 | 86 | 13 | (11- 17) |
Surgery alone | 32 | 29 | 6 | (3- 16) |
Both chemotherapy and surgery | 64 | 55 | 19 | (16- 29) |
Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS) | ||||
No treatment administered | 56 | 53 | 3 | (2- 5) |
Chemotherapy alone | 87 | 75 | 13 | (11-18) |
Surgery alone | 30 | 21 | 15 | (4-43) |
Both chemotherapy and surgery | 62 | 49 | 19 | (16-31) |
Conclusions
The combined usage of surgery and chemotherapy significantly improved the median overall and cancer-specific survival for (GA) patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
194P - Real-world outcomes of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer with PD-L1 CPS≤5
Presenter: Qi Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
195P - Ferroptosis signatures in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and their role in patient survival: A translational unsupervised clustering analysis
Presenter: Quoc-Huy Trinh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
196P - Clinical significance of circulating CD8+ and CD4+ T cell proliferation in advanced gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy
Presenter: In-Ho Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
197P - Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic (UAM) gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GA/GEJA) in China: A multicenter real-world study
Presenter: Yanqiao Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
198P - Effectiveness of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter observational study in Japan
Presenter: Namiki Izumi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
199P - Efficacy of endostar in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus: A randomized, open-label, phase II trial
Presenter: Yuexiao Qi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
200P - Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization: Development and validation of the ALFP score
Presenter: Baocuo Gong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
201P - A phase II study of serplulimab (a programmed death-1 inhibitor) with or without HLX04 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhenggang Ren
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
202P - Comparison of liver injury after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Yongru Chen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
203P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jia He
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract