Abstract 198P
Background
Geographic access to medical care varies for nearly every specialty in India. Brachytherapy (BT) is emblematic of several of these access difficulties since it necessitates specialized equipment, the capacity to maintain a radioactive source, and particular skill sets. To quantify the unmet infrastructure needs, we conducted this study to report the availability of brachytherapy treatment units in relation to state-level population, and gynaecologic cancer incidence in India.
Methods
The availability of BT resources at the state level in India was obtained from the IAEA database. The population of each state was estimated using data from the Government of India's census. Using National Cancer Registry program data, the number of cancer cases was approximated for each state and union territory. The total number of gynaecological cancers that required BT was determined. BT capacity was estimated at three procedures per unit per day for 240 days(Excluding holidays and weekends) as follows: number of BT units x 240 x 3. The disparity between available and needed infrastructure was used to compute the deficit in BT units. Number of BT facilities available in medical colleges across India were calculated. The BT infrastructure was also compared to those of other nations in terms of the number of BT units available per million people and for various malignancies.
Results
India has 1 brachytherapy unit every 42,93,031 population. With respect to state wise data, 21 states and union territories had deficits of brachytherapy units. The maximum deficit was seen in Uttar Pradesh. The maximum units per 10,000 cancer patients was noted in Delhi (7) and the least was noted in the North Eastern states (<1). In brachytherapy of gynaecological cancers a deficit ranging from 1-75 units were noted across the states. It was noted that only 104 out of the 613 medical colleges in India had BT facilities. India had 1 BT machine for every 4181 cancer patients when compared to USA ( 2956 patients), Germany (2754 patients) and Japan (4303 patients).
Conclusions
The study identified the deficits of BT facilities in India and provides a direction for the development of BT infrastructure.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Abhishek Krishna.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
247TiP - Addition of induction, concurrent and maintenance durvalumab to induction and concurrent chemoradiation vs induction and concurrent chemoradiation for previously untreated locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A phase II randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: Victor Lee
Session: Poster viewing 03
248P - The use of complementary medicine in Chinese pediatric patients receiving palliative care: A multi-centre study
Presenter: Chun SIng Lam
Session: Poster viewing 03
249P - Improving quality of life and symptom burden with opioids and adjuncts in lung cancer (IQSOL study)
Presenter: Naren Gokulanathan
Session: Poster viewing 03
250P - An analysis of nutritional and psychological status of patients with advanced cancer
Presenter: Shasha Wang
Session: Poster viewing 03
251P - Is QUAD SHOT palliative cyclical hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer the way to go? An alternative regimen in low resource countries
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster viewing 03
252P - Preferred place of death among terminally ill cancer patients: A single centre observational study from India
Presenter: Suhana Sulfiker
Session: Poster viewing 03
253P - Hemostatic radiotherapy for gastric cancer: MRI as an alternative to endoscopy for post-treatment evaluation
Presenter: Osamu Tanaka
Session: Poster viewing 03
254P - Sexual function of cervical cancer survivors: A single center prospective study
Presenter: Dinesh Ravikumar
Session: Poster viewing 03
255P - Volunteers’ role to provide quality palliative care for terminal cancer
Presenter: SAPTAPARNA JANA
Session: Poster viewing 03