Abstract 345P
Background
Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, endemic in southeast Asia. LELC has histologic resemblance to undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which is highly sensitive to gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy. Evidence to support this treatment in LELC is however limited. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) or gemcitabine-carboplatin (GC) in relapsed or metastatic pulmonary LELC.
Methods
Consecutive patients with relapsed or metastatic pulmonary LELC who received palliative systemic therapies in 2010 – 2019 in Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong were reviewed. Treatment response was assessed by clinical history, physical examination, and imaging. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical predictors were analyzed by log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model.
Results
76 eligible patients (40 male, 36 female) were included. 59 patients received first-line gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy—21 with GP and 38 with GC; the rest received other platinum doublets (n = 9), capecitabine-based chemotherapy (n = 7), or immunotherapy (n = 1). The median age was 58.7 years old; none of the tumors harbored EGFR or ALK mutation. The median chemotherapy cycles given was 4 for both GP/GC (range 1 – 8) and non-GP/GC (range 1 – 11). With a median follow-up of 26.0 months, the median PFS and OS for patients who received GP/GC were 9.5 and 28.6 months respectively. GP/GC had a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (78.0% vs 41.2%, p = 0.004) than non-GP/GC. No significant differences in ORR, PFS and OS between GP and GC were observed. On multivariate analyses, use of GP/GC was a significant predictive factor for longer PFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 – 0.85, p = 0.013); presence of liver and bone metastasis were significant negative predictors for PFS.
Conclusions
This study confirms gemcitabine-platinum’s role as first-line treatment for relapsed or metastatic pulmonary LELC. Further studies are warranted to shape the optimal treatment landscape for this rare disease.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
364P - Tepotinib with an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutant MET-amplified NSCLC: A case series
Presenter: Azura Ahmad
Session: Poster viewing 05.
365P - Patterns of progression on first-line osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A Swiss cohort study
Presenter: Alexandra Schuler
Session: Poster viewing 05.
366P - EGFR amplification is a putative resistance mechanism for NSCLC-LM patients with TKI therapy and is associated with poor outcome
Presenter: Hainan Yang
Session: Poster viewing 05.
367P - High-dose aumolertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases: Primary data from ACHIEVE
Presenter: Yun Fan
Session: Poster viewing 05.
368P - A special Imaging pattern of bilateral diffuse metastases in advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations was associated with a favorable prognosis to EGFR-TKIs
Presenter: Zhen-Bang Gu
Session: Poster viewing 05.
370P - Outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC co-mutations receiving aumolertinib as first-line treatment: A retrospective study
Presenter: Fang Cun
Session: Poster viewing 05.
371P - Real-world data of first-line treatment with aumolertinib for elderly EGFR+ NSCLC patients
Presenter: Haitao Zhang
Session: Poster viewing 05.
373P - Safety and efficacy of aumolertinib treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations: Cohort 2
Presenter: WenFeng Fang
Session: Poster viewing 05.