Abstract 456P
Background
Osteogenic augmentation is required in various orthopaedic conditions. Defects caused by removal of malignant or local bone tumours requires reconstructive surgeries to restore skeletal continuity and bone grafts to fill bone defects. Different modalities which can help to increase osteogenesis include autografts, allografts and synthetic bone graft substitutes. Autograft is the gold standard, provides osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties but has limitations of requirement for additional incisions, poor bone quality in elderly patients, increases operation time, causes donor site pain and morbidity and likely permanent residual disability and limited amount. Autograft is the gold standard but is available in limited amount and morbidities associated with it. Bone graft substitutes are costly, limited in quantity and don’t integrate with host bone. Bone allografts are a good option, but not widely used in India and there are sparse reports in literature from developing countries. Our study signifies use of gamma irradiated deep freezed bone allografts in treatment of various bone tumours.
Methods
It’s a prospective descriptive study. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, as per standard guidelines of American and European Association of Tissue Banking, were followed. We have a in-house facility of gamma irradiated deep freezed bone allografts available in hospital. 20 patients with giant cell tumours of proximal tibia, proximal ulna and distal radius, aneurysmal bone cysts of proximal humerus and distal radius, etc were operated during one year and followed up for atleast 24 weeks thereafter . Sloof's Criteria was used for assessing osteointegration of grafts.
Results
Allografts have not only accepted well but defects have healed and bone integration is at various stages. Only one patient got infected (5%). 19 out of 20 patients (95 %) in our study group had either attained or at various stages of osteointegration and healing.
Conclusions
We conclude that deep freezed bone allografts is a viable option in patients with large bone defects after resection of bone tumours, thus give satisfactory surgical outcome, with no serious side effects.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
9P - XRCC1 Arg194Trp, Palb2 T1100T (3300T>G), HMMR V353A, TNF aG308A polymorphisms as diagnostic and prognostic markers of breast cancer in the Kyrgyz ethnic group
Presenter: Aigul Semetei kyzy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
232P - Early Results from the Phase I Study of SY-1365, a Potent and Selective CDK7 inhibitor, in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Debra Richardson
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
382P - Drug metabolizing enzymes pharmacogenomic: Biomarkers for improved chemotherapy in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Sunishtha Bhatia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
401P - Women in oncology: Alarming figures from India
Presenter: Sharada Mailankody
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
416P - Multidisciplinary management of sarcomas of the head and neck: An institutional experience
Presenter: Kavitha Jain
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
523P - Co-morbilities and survival of patients initially diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Impact of hypertension, diabetes and chronic hepatitis B viral infection
Presenter: Weigang Xiu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
529P - Osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and asymptomatic brain metastases: An open-label, two-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Roni Gillis
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract