Abstract 361P
Background
Here in India almost 75% of cancer patient die a sad death of neglect due to lack of awareness about palliative care and low economic level. Surveys in India show that two third of cancer patient do not get proper care during the terminal phase of their life. Palliative care through volunteers can make a significant difference in this respect. To identify and try to solve, to the extent possible, the main difficulties in giving palliative care to the terminal cancer patients of the area. And evaluate the impact of volunteer’s direct care of palliative patients and their families.
Methods
Feedback from patients and their relatives regarding the palliative care they receive from nursing home and from volunteers and compare the two. Also feedback from volunteers regarding their positive and negative experience while delivering palliative care service. Then evaluate the data to compare and improve the quality of service.
Results
We carried out two studies. One study was undertaken in nursing home palliative care and another was in home setting by volunteers. Both studies were in adult palliative care services. Since January 2018, 416 cases were studied to enquire about their experience in both home based care and nursing home care. Both the studies fulfilled our quality appraisal criteria. One found that those families and patients who received home visits from volunteers were significantly more satisfied. The study highlighted the value of the role of volunteers in better satisfaction of patients and their families.
Conclusions
Further research is needed to evaluate the role of volunteers in palliative care and how it can be delivered appropriately and effectively. We also wish to compare our findings with similar studies elsewhere.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87P - Negative to positive lymph node ratio-prognostic marker of survival in node positive rectal cancer
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
88P - The Sidra LUMC advanced colon cancer NGS cohort
Presenter: Wouter Hendrickx
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - A phase II trial of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with high-risk rectal submucosal invasive cancer after local resection
Presenter: Masaaki Noguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - High MICB expression confers prognostic benefit in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Shanchao Yu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study
Presenter: Chien-Hsin Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - Prospective randomized controlled study comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric carcinoma
Presenter: Vipin Goel
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Biomarker selection of liver metastatic colorectal patients for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: A machine learning analysis
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - NORTH/HGCSG1003: North Japan multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin-containing regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: Final analysis
Presenter: Michio Nakamura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Anatomical resections improve relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF- mutated colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Ye Wei
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Incidence, characteristics and prognosis in colorectal cancer with CNS metastases
Presenter: Nicola Taylor
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract