Abstract 140P
Background
Periampullary carcinoma accounts for over 30,000 cancer-related deaths per year in the US. The outcome of the disease differs according to the chosen modality of treatment. This study compared the survival rate between patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy alone versus those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy before undergoing the surgery in stage II and III periampullary carcinoma.
Methods
Using the SEER database, we extracted the data of 868 patients with periampullary carcinoma from 2007 to 2011, aged between 40-79 years old. We selected patients with periampullary carcinomas who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy alone compared to those received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before the surgery.
Results
The highest 5-year survival rate was observed in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy (20.1%); especially those of stage II (20.1%). However, we found no significant difference in overall survival regarding the patients' gender or race.Table:
140P
Variables | Overall survival | p-value |
---|---|---|
Therapy Surgery Combined | 17.3% 20.1% | 0.000** |
Stage II III | 20.1% 7.9 % | 0.000** |
Race White Black | 19.0% 22.7% | 0.732 |
Sex Male Female | 19.3% 19.5% | 0.388 |
Highly significant p-value at ≤ 0.001 Combined: neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.
Conclusions
Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy before pancreaticoduodenectomy had better 5-year overall survival compared to those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy alone; especially stage II.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Mai Abdelkader.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
221P - Comparative analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective real-world evidence
Presenter: Hsiang‐Lan Lai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
222P - Does tumor grade really improve the prognostic ability of the staging system for men with penile cancer: A SEER database analysis
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
223TiP - EV-301: A phase III trial in progress evaluating enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
230P - Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC): SOLO1 China cohort
Presenter: Lingying Wu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
231P - Cost-effectiveness of olaparib vs routine surveillance in the maintenance setting for patients with BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in Singapore
Presenter: David SP Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
233P - Incorporation of correlative studies in ovarian cancers in the era of precision medicine: Assessment of accountability and utility
Presenter: Nadia Hitchen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
234P - Implementation of mainstream BRCA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer in a tertiary centre
Presenter: Edbert Wong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
235P - The efficacy of radiation therapy in ovarian carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of a population-based study
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
236P - Front-line maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: What’s next PARP inhibitors?
Presenter: Han Gong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
237P - PARP inhibitor in platinum resistant ovarian cancer: Single center real world experience
Presenter: Saphalta Baghmar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract