Abstract 490P
Background
EGFR T790M mutations have been reported to occur in about 50% of patients (pts) at progression on 1st/2nd generation EGFR TKI therapy. These pts benefit from treatment with 3rd generation EGFR TKI osimertinib. However, observational real-world studies show that the proportion of pts receiving 2nd line osimertinib is lower than expected. We aimed to evaluate these treatment patterns and outcomes in our institution.
Methods
In this prospective observational study, survival, response and treatment data was collected from pts with EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC who received EGFR TKIs in the 1st line, who were treated in our institution from September 2012 to December 2017. Institutional approval was obtained and all patients provided written, informed consent.
Results
108 pts (median age 65 years, 54% females, 75% never smokers, 54% EGFR exon 19 deletion) were enrolled of whom 48 (44%) received gefitinib, 38 (35%) erlotinib and 22 (20%) afatinib in the 1st line. The median overall survival (OS) was 33.1 months (95% CI 24.5-41.7) and median progression free survival (PFS) was 11.1 months (95% CI 8.5-13.7). 83 pts (77%) had progressed at the time of analysis, and 48/83 patients (58%) underwent T790M testing. Of these, 25/48 (52%) were T790M positive. 21/83 pts went on to receive osimertinib in the 2nd line (25% of all patients who progressed on 1st line therapy)- OS was not reached in these pts. 12/83 pts received 2nd line chemotherapy (15%); 32/83 pts (39%) did not receive any 2nd line treatment. OS was 42.3 months (95% CI 24.2-50.4) and 18.2 months (95% CI 11.6-24.7) in these groups respectively.
Conclusions
In this prospective real-world study, a significant proportion of patients did not receive 2nd line therapy after progression on 1st/2nd generation TKIs. The rates of T790M mutations when tested was comparable to that reported in the literature. Some reasons for not receiving 2nd line therapy included low testing rates for EGFR T790M and patient fitness for 2nd line therapy. This suboptimal use of osimertinib in the 2nd line setting, together with favourable PFS data for osimertinib in the 1st line, favours the upfront use of osimertinib.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C.S. Tan: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Eli-Lilly; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): BMS. R.A. Soo: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self): Ignyta; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Yuhan. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
164P - Multi-centered phase II trial of weekly 5-FU plus l-LV regimen as salvage line chemotherapy for oral fluorouracil resistant advanced gastric cancer (HGCSG1502)
Presenter: Yusuke Sasaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
165P - Lenvatinib treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The relationship between efficacy and safety
Presenter: Takayoshi Oikawa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
166P - The comparison between UGT1A1 single heterozygous and wild type regarding the clinical outcomes of fixed dose irinotecan monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: Multicenter retrospective study
Presenter: Takahide Sasaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
167P - Prognostic impact of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in advanced pancreatic cancer treated with GEM plus nab-PTX or FOLFIRINOX: Based on the results of a multicenter retrospective study (the NAPOLEON study)
Presenter: Akitaka Makiyama
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
168P - A retrospective multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)
Presenter: Takuya Honda
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
169P - M-phase phosphoprotein 8 promotes gastric cancer growth and metastasis via p53/Bcl-2 and EMT-related signalling pathways
Presenter: Yizhuo Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
170P - Surgery alone versus surgery combined with Chemotherapy: Survival patterns among patients with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Yasmine Ashraf
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
171P - The clinical value of prognostic nutritional index in patients with anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy
Presenter: Yan Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
172P - Preoperative neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts recurrence after surgery in patient with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN)
Presenter: Takayuki Miura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
173P - Cancer stem-like phenotypes including immune surveillance and its responsible genes in induced liver cancer stem-like cells
Presenter: Ryouichi Tsunedomi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract