Abstract 367P
Background
MET amplification is a rare genetic mutation which can be treated with small-molecule inhibitor-crizotinib. Based on the detection of next-generation sequencing, the molecular characteristics and the efficacy of crizotinib among different subsets of MET amplification in lung cancer patients is poorly understood.
Methods
From January 2018 to April 2019, patients with MET amplification detected by next-generation sequencing were retrospectively collected and the efficacy of crizotinib among different subsets of patients were analyzed.
Results
In our study, 4.16% (112/2694) patients were found to have MET amplification and only 19 patients treated with monotherapy crizotinib. Among the 112 MET amplification patients, primary (with or without other mutation) MET amplification accounted for 3.27% (82/2507) and 16.04% (30/187) re-biopsy patients were found to have acquired MET amplification after the failed treatment of EGFR-TKI. The frequency of MET amplification combined with EGFR 21L858R was slightly higher than that of MET amplification combined with EGFR 19 del (primary or acquired). Primary MET amplification can occur simultaneously with EGFR 20ins or ALK rearrangement. In survival analysis, the median PFS of 10 patients with copy number greater than 4 (CN > 4) seems longer than the nine patients with copy number less than or equal to 4 (CN ≤ 4) (4.7 months vs 2.7 months) and the two curves were separate, but failed to get a statistical significance (p = 0.085). No significant difference has been discovered between the median PFS of primary (4.04 months; 95%CI: 0.33-7.74 months) and acquired (2.99 months; 95% CI: 2.51-3.47 months; P = 0.382) MET amplification.
Conclusions
4.16% lung cancer patients were found to have MET amplification based on the detection of NGS. MET amplification patients treated with crizotinib with copy number greater than 4 (CN > 4) seem have longer PFS. No obvious survival difference has been discovered between primary and acquired MET amplification.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
381P - XKR8 is a promising potential prognostic marker in glioblastoma multiforme patients
Presenter: Kristina Havrysh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
383P - Screening of prognostic molecular biomarker for resectable pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yonggang Peng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
384P - Prevalence of abnormal microsatellite instability test among ovary and endometrial cancer patients
Presenter: Min Kyu Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
385P - Identifying CASP8 polymorphisms associated with breast cancer risk in an Iranian population
Presenter: Alireza Pasdar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
386P - Unusual folding of NaPi2b transporter extramembrane domain 4 during malignant transformation
Presenter: Leysan Minigulova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
387P - 5-years conditional disease free survival and overall survival for breast cancer patients in South Korea
Presenter: Jee hyun Ahn
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
388P - To identify circulating tumour cells by machine learning approach
Presenter: Yuebin Liang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
389P - The establishment of patient-derived organoid models and drug response of resectable non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Jing-Hua Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
395P - Filipinos and lung cancer: An infodemiological assessment using Google trends from 2009 to 2019
Presenter: Lance Isidore Catedral
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
396P - Determinants of visiting a referral hospital for cervical cancer screening at Uganda Cancer Institute
Presenter: Collins Mpamani
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract