Abstract 121P
Background
Three-dimensional (3D) vision technology has recently been validated for the improvement of surgical skills in a simulated setting. This study to assess the current evidence regarding the efficiency and potential advantages of 3D compared with two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic rectal surgery for rectal cancer.
Methods
We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and no randomized controlled trials assessing the two approaches.
Results
Four trials including a total of 331 cases were identified. The positive circumferential resection margins (CRM) is significantly lower for 3D (P = 0.02). The operative time was significantly shorter in the 3D group than in the 2D group (P < 0.00001). There were less estimated blood loss (EBL) in the 3D group than in the 2D group (P = 0.02). Perioperative complication rates, conversion rate, harvested lymph nodes, first flatus, and length of stay did not differ significantly between two approaches (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
3D laparoscopic rectal surgery appear to have advantages over the 2D laparoscopic rectal surgery in terms of operation time and positive CRM, however, it is not better than 2D laparoscopic rectal surgery in terms of EBL and postoperative complications.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Laiyuan Li.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
117P - Short-term and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for multiple colorectal liver metastases: A propensity score matching study
Presenter: Wenbai Huang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
119P - The impacts of dose-time-fractionation schedules on pathological complete response rate (pCR) and local recurrence (LR)
Presenter: Fu Jin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
120P - Platelet to lymphocyte ratio is associated with tumour localization and outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ahmet Bilici
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
127P - Outcomes based on albumin‐bilirubin (ALBI) grade in the phase III CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
128P - Tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for Chinese patients (Pts) with gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Yuxian Bai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
129P - Monitoring patient-specific mutation in ctDNA and CTC for tumour response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (NCT03425058)
Presenter: Tao Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
130P - Development of a liver cancer risk prediction model for the general population in china: A potential tool for screening
Presenter: Xiaoshuang Feng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
131P - Cabozantinib in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and other solid tumours: Population pharmacokinetics analysis
Presenter: Chih-Hung Hsu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
132P - Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/levoleucovorin (5 FU/LV) vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients (pts) with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC)
Presenter: Tatsuya Ioka
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
133P - Prognostic and predictive factors from the phase III CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib (C) versus placebo (P) in previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Thomas Yau
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract