Abstract 157P
Background
Gastric cancer (GC) is among the most common malignancy worldwide. The UICC/AJCC TNM classification is the most commonly used classification system. For adequate N staging at least 15 lymph nodes should be retrieved. In some countries, this amount of lymph nodes is not met, which can lead to understaging. The phenomenon of stage migration is caused by an insufficient number of lymph nodes examined. In order to reduce stage migration, some investigators have proposed using the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR), namely the ratio between positive lymph nodes compared with the total number of lymph nodes examined, as a new prognostic indicator for gastric cancer.
Methods
Total 116 patients who underwent upfront D2 gastrectomy between 2012 to 2017 were included. LNR has classified into 4 groups: LNR0; 0, LNR1; >0-0.13; LNR2; 0.14-0.40 and LNR3; 0.41-1. We have used Kaplan-Meier method to calculate survival rates and log rank test to compare survival curves between groups.
Results
Males (58.6%) were more common than females (41.4%). Mean age at presentation was 56.12 years. Most common mode of presentation was pain abdomen (53.8%). Most common location of tumor was distal part (81%). Most commonly done procedure was distal radical gastrectomy (56.9%) followed by subtotal gastrectomy (32.8%). Median number of lymph nodes isolated was 14. 54 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy while 32 patients adjuvant chemoradiation. At a median followup of 14 months (range, 2–78 months), overall 5-year survival was 23.75%. (Median survival: 24 months). The 5-year survival for Stages I–III was 100%, 26.25%, and 11.25%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the univariate analysis; sex (p < 0.05), tumor grade (p < 0.001), T stage (p < 0.001), N stage (p < 0.001), TNM stage (p < 0.001), and LNR (p < 0.001) were statistically significant. The multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade, T stage, N stage, TNM stage and LNR still had statistical significance. In subgroup analysis of patients with less than 15 obtained lymph nodes, LNR was still a significant predictor of survival.
Conclusions
LNR can estimate prognosis of patients who undergo D2 gastrectomy, regardless of the number of lymph nodes examined. Thus LNR may become a new indicator to evaluate prognosis after D2 gastrectomy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract