Abstract 5P
Background
To determine the long-term prognostic role of hormone receptor subtype in breast cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Methods
Data of 810,587 female operable invasive breast cancer patients from SEER database with a mean follow-up period of 94.2 months (range, 0-311 months) were analyzed. Hormone receptor subtype was classified into four groups based on estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) statuses: ER(+)/PR(+), ER(+)/PR(-), ER(-)/PR(+), and ER(-)/PR(-).
Results
Numbers of subjects with ER(+)/PR(+), ER(+)/PR(-), ER(-)/PR(+), ER(-)/PR(-), and unknown were 496,279 (61.2%), 86,858 (10.7%), 11,545 (1.4%), 135,441 (16.7%), and 80,464 (9.9%), respectively. The ER(+)/PR(+) subtype showed the best breast cancer specific survival, followed by ER(+)/PR(-), ER(-)/PR(+), and ER(-)/PR(-) subtypes in order (all p < 0.001). Survival difference among hormone receptor subtypes was maintained in subgroup analysis according to anatomic stage, race, age group, and year of diagnosis. Hormone receptor subtype was a significant independent prognostic factor in multivariable analyses (p < 0.001). Hazard ratios of ER(+)/PR(-), ER(-)/PR(+), and ER(-)/PR(-) for breast cancer specific mortality risk were 1.419 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.383-1.456), 1.630 (95% CI, 1.537-1.729), and 1.811 (95% CI, 1.773-1.848), respectively, with ER(+)/PR(+) as reference.
Conclusions
Hormone receptor subtype is a significant independent prognostic factor in female operable invasive breast cancer with long-term effect. The ER(+)/PR(+) subtype shows the most favorable prognosis, followed by ER(+)/PR(-), ER(-)/PR(+), and ER(-)/PR(-) subtypes in order. Prognostic impacts of hormone receptor subtypes are also maintained in subgroup analysis according to anatomic stage, race, age, and year of diagnosis.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
175P - Hypermethylation of the PCDHB15 promoter predicts the prognosis in gastric cancer
Presenter: Yu-ting Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
176P - DCLK1 promotes tumour invasion and metastasis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the MEK/ERK pathway in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Jiannan Yao
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
177P - Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus ramcirumab and paclitaxel plus ramcirumab in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric cancer
Presenter: Yosuke Horita
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
178P - Chief cell in stomach have stem cell activity and potential to develop gastric cancer
Presenter: Akihiro Yamamura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
179P - Postoperative Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization versus surgery alone for resected hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity-score matching study
Presenter: Mingyu Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
180P - LHPP inhibit the cell proliferation and EMT via the TGFβ/SMAD3 signaling pathway in iCCA
Presenter: Dan Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
181P - The emerging role of third-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Andrew Dean
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
182P - Durable response to second-line m-FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with performance status of two or less
Presenter: Adarsh Das
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
183P - Epidemiologic profile of gastric cancer in East Azerbaijan, Iran: 2 years population-based cancer registry results
Presenter: Pooneh Jabbaripour
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
184P - Expression pattern of CDK12 protein in gastric cancer and its positive correlation with CD8+ cell density and CCL12 expression
Presenter: Jun Ji
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract