Abstract 132P
Background
In the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly increased median PFS (mPFS) vs 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs 1.5 months [mo], unstratified HR = 0.56, P = 0.0001) in pts with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomised phase 2 trial evaluated nalIRI+5FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese pts with gemcitabine-refractory mPAC (NCT02697058).Table:
132P
nal-IRI+5-FU/ LV n = 40 | 5-FU/ LV n = 39 | |
---|---|---|
PFS, mo (investigator assessed) | ||
Median | 2.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–5.0 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.60 | |
95% CI | 0.37–0.98 | |
P-value | 0.039 | |
PFS, mo (independently assessed) | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.6 |
95% CI | 1.5–3.6 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.79 | |
95% CI | 0.47–1.32 | |
P-value | 0.376 | |
Best overall response, n (%) | 40 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) |
ORR | 8 (20.0) | 1 (2.6) |
P-value | 0.029 | |
Disease control rate, n (%) | 8 (20.0) | 2 (5.1) |
P-value | 0.087 | |
OS, mo | ||
Median | 6.3 | NR |
95% CI | 5.2–NR | 6.1–NR |
HR | 1.67 | |
95% CI | 0.88–3.16 | |
P-value | 0.110 | |
TTF, mo | ||
Median | 1.7 | 1.5 |
95% CI | 1.5–2.2 | 1.4–1.6 |
HR | 0.70 | |
95% CI | 0.44–1.12 | |
P-value | 0.134 | |
CA19-9 response rate,n/evaluable population (%) | 5/28 (17.9) | 1/28 (3.6) |
P-value | 0.193 |
Methods
This study assessed nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability as per the NAPOLI-1 dosing regimen (Part 1), and safety and efficacy (Part 2). Part 2 outcomes are reported. Pts were randomised 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs ≥ 90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dL vs < 4.0 g/dL). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA199 response and QoL. The ITT population comprised all pts randomised.
Results
Differences in pt baseline characteristics were noted in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40/79) vs 5FU/LV (n = 39/79) arms, e.g. hepatic lesions (63% vs 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs 72%). Efficacy results are shown in the table. Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant vs 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs 1.5 mo, P = 0.039). Independently-assessed mPFS showed a similar trend (1.7 vs 1.6 mo, P = 0.376). mOS was 6.3 mo with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. DCR, TTF, CA19-9 and ORR response increased, ORR significantly, with nalIRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV. The most commonly reported grade ≥3 TEAEs with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs 0) and diarrhoea (17% vs 3%).
Conclusions
Treatment with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed mPFS and ORR vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02697058.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Lamb of Physicians World Europe GmbH, Mannheim, Germany and was funded by Servier Global Medical Affairs (Suresnes, France).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Servier and the authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
T. Ioka: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. M. Kanai: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraBioPharma Inc. M. Ikeda: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer Yakuhin; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Research grant / Funding (self): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly Japan; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxalta Japan Limited; Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (self): Nano Carrier; Research grant / Funding (self): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Takar Bio. T. Okusaka: Honoraria (self): Meiji Seika Pharma ; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): AbbVie Inc.; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Shire; Honoraria (self): ; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma K.K.; Honoraria (self): Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Pfizer Japan Inc.; Honoraria (self): FUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd ; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca K.K.; Research grant / Funding (self): Baxter. J. Furuse: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. Y. Komatsu: Advisory / Consultancy: Yakult; Advisory / Consultancy: Taiho; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. S. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte Corporation; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Baxalta Japan; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Yakult; Research grant / Funding (institution): IQVIA Services Japan. P. Chugh: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. R. Tang: Full / Part-time employment: Servier. M. Ueno: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Shire; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoCarrier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87P - Negative to positive lymph node ratio-prognostic marker of survival in node positive rectal cancer
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
88P - The Sidra LUMC advanced colon cancer NGS cohort
Presenter: Wouter Hendrickx
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - A phase II trial of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with high-risk rectal submucosal invasive cancer after local resection
Presenter: Masaaki Noguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - High MICB expression confers prognostic benefit in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Shanchao Yu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study
Presenter: Chien-Hsin Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - Prospective randomized controlled study comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric carcinoma
Presenter: Vipin Goel
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Biomarker selection of liver metastatic colorectal patients for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: A machine learning analysis
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - NORTH/HGCSG1003: North Japan multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin-containing regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: Final analysis
Presenter: Michio Nakamura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Anatomical resections improve relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF- mutated colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Ye Wei
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Incidence, characteristics and prognosis in colorectal cancer with CNS metastases
Presenter: Nicola Taylor
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract