Abstract 111P
Background
In present time, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal cancer is part of clinical guidelines in Europe and the USA. According to the literature, there are no unified standards for upper rectal cancer.
Methods
The study included data from patients over 18 years old, with histologically proven adenocarcinoma with TNM stage T2-4aN0-2M0 and tumour location in the upper part of the rectum (10-15 sm). In the main group (A), preoperative chemoradiotherapy was performed: short-course radiotherapy (5x5 Gy), with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 × 2 times for 14 days, followed by surgical treatment. In the control group (B) only surgical treatment was performed - partial or total mesorectumectomy.
Results
From January 2004 to December 2014, 226 (99.6%) underwent surgical treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications byClavien-Dindo scale was:group A - 17 (16.5%) and group B - 11 (8.9%). Local recurrences in group A occurred in 1 patient (1.2%), in group B - in 3 (2.5%) patients (p = 0.413). Distant metastases in group A developed in 10 (10.2%) patients, in group B -15 (12.6%) patients (p = 0.581). Overall survival was in group A - 90.6%, recurrence-free - 89.6%; in group B - 82.8% and 81.9%, respectively (p = 0.46). Multivariate analysis showed that the affected regional lymph nodes were the main predictor of poor prognosis (p = 0.001, OR = 0.094, CI = 0.035-0.250) and significantly reduced the 5-year disease-free survival rate (p = 0.001, OR = 4.213, CI = 2.010-8.830).
Conclusions
The results of the study showed that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in comparison with the surgical method does not have an advantage for patients with upper rectum cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Jasur Madyarov.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
41P - Clinical verification on the relationship between serum lipid metabolism and the immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Wataru Goto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
42P - Genome wide copy number analysis of circulating tumour cells in breast cancer liver metastasis
Presenter: Saber Imani
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
43P - A hotspot variants p.H1047R and p.H1047L in p110α/ΔNp63α complex affects structure, function and contributes to susceptibility metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Zou Linglin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
44P - Correlation of circulating tumour cells with PET-CT in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
45P - The challenge of evaluating new targeted therapies: Opportunities in stratifying the therapeutic response per tumour location
Presenter: Hubert Beaumont
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
46P - Plasma soluble CD36 of breast cancer based on pathological and clinical characteristics
Presenter: Aditia Romadhoni
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
47P - Investigation of the use of a novel S-1 administration method for treating metastatic and recurrent breast cancer
Presenter: MAYUKO MIKI
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
48P - Development of MDA-MB-231-3D-Spheroid as a reliable model for studying Nav1.5 and nNav1.5-mediated breast cancer metastasis
Presenter: Ahmad Murtadha
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
49P - Biochemical study on modifying role of variants of leptin gene and its receptor on serum leptin levels in breast cancer
Presenter: Alshimaa Alhanafy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
50P - Prognostic factors of recurrence or distant metastasis in elderly breast cancer patients
Presenter: Seungju Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract