Abstract 108P
Background
About 70% of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases (LM). Although colorectal cancer patients with resectable LM have a good prognosis, there is little data at the difference in the locations of LM. We investigated how the location of LM affects prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.
Methods
The medical records of 196 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis from January 2008 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We defined liver metastasis within a 3-cm-radius sphere centered on the bifurcation of portal vein by computed tomography as central LM (group C), and other LM outside the 3-cm-radius sphere as peripheral LM (group P). We investigated the relation between location of LM and prognosis by using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, and the relation between location of LM and resection by using the chi-square test.
Results
Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 68.4 (range 30-87), female/male 115/81, colon/rectal cancer 117/79, advanced/recurrent 150/46, respectively. The characteristics of liver metastasis were as follows: mean maximum tumor size 38 mm (3 - 200), tumor number single/multi 58/138, group C/P 84/112, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 31 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 25.5 to 36.5 months] from the date of first diagnosis of LM. We divided 196 patients into two groups ofgroup C (n = 84) and group P (n = 112) by location of LM. Resection rate of LM was 11.9% (group C) and 50.9% (group P). Median OS in group C and group P was 18 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 23.7 months) and 38 months (95% CI, 35.2 to 40.8 months), respectively (p < 0.001). Resection of LM was performed significantly more often in group P than in group C (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the patients with resectable LM had a good prognosis not only in group P (mean OS 135 months, 95% CI, 109.4 to 160.7 months) but also in group C (mean OS 82 months, 95% CI, 67.5 to 96.0 months).
Conclusions
It is suggested that the colorectal cancer patients with peripheral LM might have a better prognosis than the patients with central LM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
221P - Comparative analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective real-world evidence
Presenter: Hsiang‐Lan Lai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
222P - Does tumor grade really improve the prognostic ability of the staging system for men with penile cancer: A SEER database analysis
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
223TiP - EV-301: A phase III trial in progress evaluating enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
230P - Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC): SOLO1 China cohort
Presenter: Lingying Wu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
231P - Cost-effectiveness of olaparib vs routine surveillance in the maintenance setting for patients with BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in Singapore
Presenter: David SP Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
233P - Incorporation of correlative studies in ovarian cancers in the era of precision medicine: Assessment of accountability and utility
Presenter: Nadia Hitchen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
234P - Implementation of mainstream BRCA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer in a tertiary centre
Presenter: Edbert Wong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
235P - The efficacy of radiation therapy in ovarian carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of a population-based study
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
236P - Front-line maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: What’s next PARP inhibitors?
Presenter: Han Gong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
237P - PARP inhibitor in platinum resistant ovarian cancer: Single center real world experience
Presenter: Saphalta Baghmar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract