Abstract 212P
Background
The standard practice for management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients in India has been sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line setting, and everolimus at progression. Nivolumab in the second line setting, showed a median overall survival (OS) of 26 months, 2year OS rate of 52% and objective response rate(ORR) of 26%; which was better than everolimus in the Checkmate 025 study. There is sparse data about nivolumab in Indian RCC patients.
Methods
This is a single centre, retrospective analysis, which included mRCC patients who received nivolumab between April 2016 to April 2019. The endpoints were ORR, OS and adverse events (AEs).
Results
31 patients of mRCC received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg or flat dose of 240mg. Median age was 60 years (22-82 years). There were 27 males and 4 females. 4 patients received first line nivolumab, and 27 patients as second line. 16 patients had earlier received sunitinib, 10 pazopanib, and 1 sorafinib. 3 patients (9.7%) achieved complete response(CR), 8(25.8%) achieved partial response, 8(25.8%)had stable disease and 12(38.7%)had progressive disease. The 3 patients with CR, received 18 doses, after which their treatment was stopped; and they continue to be in CR at followup of 36, 32 and 26 months respectively. 10 patients have completed more than 12 cycles. OS at 1 year is 60% and median OS has not been reached. The common AEs were fatigue in 8(25.8%), hypothyroidism in 6(19.3%), skin rash in 4(12.9%) and pneumonitis in 3(9.7%) patients. Colitis, arthritis, immune retinopathy, and myocarditis was each seen in 1 patient. Treatment was discontinued in 3 patients who developed grade 3 AEs.
Conclusions
With an ORR of 35.5%, nivolumab has replaced everolimus, and has become our standard second line regimen in mRCC. Achieving an OS at 1 year of 60% is the best we have seen in the second line setting. The most exciting impact has been the durable long lasting response seen (duration ranging 2-3 years) even after discontinuing treatment, in our 3 CR patients. This has prompted us to make 1 year of treatment as a standard duration of nivolumab for responding patients at our center; enabling us to reduce cost of treatment. It is very well tolerated; but a careful watch should be kept for immune related AEs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Amit Rauthan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Rauthan: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - The role of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the status of surgical margin in rectal cancer
Presenter: Jong Hoon Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Influence of DPYD*9, DPYD*6 and GSTP1 ile105val genetic polymorphisms on capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) associated toxicities in colorectal cancer patients
Presenter: Ashok Varma
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
99P - Patient-derived tumour model by new culture method leading to the precision medicine
Presenter: Norikatsu Miyoshi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
100P - Clinical impact and carcinogenic mechanism of NCAPG overexpression in colon cancer
Presenter: Kai-Yuan Lin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
101P - Combined cellular immunotherapy and chemotherapy improves clinical outcome and displays safety in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Chang Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
102P - Clinical features of anorectal cancer in patients with Crohn’s disease: Japanese single center study
Presenter: Kazuhiro Watanabe
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
103P - Contrast-enhanced CT-based textural parameters as potential prognostic factors of survival for colorectal cancer patients receiving targeted therapy
Presenter: Yanfei Yang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
104P - Prognostic significance of tumour location to the oncologic outcome of colon cancer
Presenter: Sare Hosseini
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
105P - Detection and clinical significance of circulating tumour cells in patients with rectal cancer
Presenter: Shuohui Dong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
106P - The risk of malignization incidence in patients with polyps and polyposis of the colon and rectum
Presenter: Yakov Ten
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract