Abstract 396P
Background
Despite the many cervical cancer prevention interventions recommended and supported by WHO and partners of low- and middle-income countries; the burden of cancer is high in Uganda and the East African region. Little is known about factors associated with participating in screening at a primary health facility (PHF) and referral to a high-level facility.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to March 2018 at Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) among women visiting for cervical cancer screening. A structured questionnaire was used. Women suspected for cervical cancer and provided consent were enrolled and administered the questionnaire. Ethics review and approval was obtained from UCI research and ethics committee. A Stata version 14.1 software was used and Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses performed.
Results
Among 522 women enrolled, only 3.26% (17) had a formal referral note and 62.64% (327) had participated in cervical cancer screening before visiting UCI. There was a 17.65% false-positive rate among the referred women suspected with cervical cancer. 67.18% (131) among those who had never screened reported personal beliefs as a factor deterring their participation. Most women were aged between 35-44 years old (ORs=2.45, 95% CI = 1.61-3.72) who were divorced/widowed (ORs=1.89, 95% CI = 1.07-3.34) and drinking alcohol (ORs=0.51, 95% CI = 0.31-0.83). Among the referred women, 17.65% delayed to honour a referral request for more than a month because of socio-economic challenges. Factors such as high education level (ORs=0.11, 95% CI = 0.02-0.48) and confirmatory tests (ORs=6.10, 95% CI = 1.93-19.31) done at UCI were associated with referrals.
Conclusions
The present study identified factors associated with participation in screening at a PHF and referral to a high-level facility, which provides better understanding of lost follow-up after screening. Awareness in high risk groups, increase of screening facilities and integration of screening services with existing health programs is necessary.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Uganda Cancer Institute-African Development Bank capacity building fund.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract