Abstract 355P
Background
Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for pain palliation in cancer patients with bone metastasis. Although both single and multiple fractionation schedules are equally effacious in pain control, various factors like re-irradiation rate, cost involved, opioid usage and radiotherapy machine load differs between the two schedules. Here, we have done a retrospective review of patients receiving palliative radiotherapy in our institute.
Methods
Case records, radiotherapy treatment plans and charts of patients who received palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis in our institute between June 2017 to May 2018 were reviewed. The demographic features, sites of primary, metastatic bone sites, fractionation schedule used, re-irradiation rates and cost analysis were studied.
Results
The study included 60 patients. Median age was 54 years (25-78). Male to female ratio was 1.1:1. Most common site of primary was lung (40%), followed by breast (21.66%) and site of bone metastasis was vertebra (51.8%), followed by pelvis (16.4%) and long bones (31.8%). Two-third of patients had metastasis to multiple bones. Multi-fraction radiotherapy was more preferred than single fraction (33.3%). Out of 60 patients, 4 were irradiated for second time and 7 underwent re-irradiation subsequently. Among single fraction RT, only 2 patients required re-irradiation. Average cost for single fraction RT is Rs.13500. Whereas for multi-fraction schedules, the treatment cost ranges from Rs.20000 to 30000 and an additional cost for hospital stay, food and transportation ranges from Rs.10000 to Rs. 65000 based fractionation size, type of radiation, in patient ward charges.
Conclusions
In a high volume center, single fractionation can be a cost-effective alternative for pain palliation with reduced rates of re-irradiation and radiotherapy machine load.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87P - Negative to positive lymph node ratio-prognostic marker of survival in node positive rectal cancer
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
88P - The Sidra LUMC advanced colon cancer NGS cohort
Presenter: Wouter Hendrickx
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - A phase II trial of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with high-risk rectal submucosal invasive cancer after local resection
Presenter: Masaaki Noguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - High MICB expression confers prognostic benefit in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Shanchao Yu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study
Presenter: Chien-Hsin Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - Prospective randomized controlled study comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric carcinoma
Presenter: Vipin Goel
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Biomarker selection of liver metastatic colorectal patients for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: A machine learning analysis
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - NORTH/HGCSG1003: North Japan multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin-containing regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: Final analysis
Presenter: Michio Nakamura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Anatomical resections improve relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF- mutated colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Ye Wei
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Incidence, characteristics and prognosis in colorectal cancer with CNS metastases
Presenter: Nicola Taylor
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract