Abstract 95P
Background
The type of liver resection (anatomical resection, AR or nonanatomical resection, NAR) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is subject to debate. The debate may persist because some certain prognostic implications, associated with worse biological behavior of tumors, have been overlooked. The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of patients who would benefit more from the performance of AR.
Methods
475 patients who underwent hepatic resection of CRLM were included and stratified by KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational status. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied in relapse-free survival (RFS), and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis in multivariable analysis.
Results
Among all 475 patients, 154 (32.4%) underwent AR and 321 (67.6%) underwent NAR. 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS for the entire cohort were 63.0%, 40.6%, and 31.2% respectively. In the cohort of patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumors, patients who underwent AR had a markedly improved median RFS compared with patients who underwent NAR (24.1 VS. 12.9 months, P = 0.005). Upon the multivariable analyses, the performance of AR (hazard ratios=0.562; 95% CI 0.370-0.854, P = 0.007) remained prognostic independently for a superior RFS. In contrast, in the cohort of patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type tumors, patients who underwent AR had a comparable median RFS compared with those who underwent NAR (24.9 VS. 20.3 months, P = 0.901).
Conclusions
Patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumors may benefit more from the performance of AR than from the performance of NAR.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital.
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
155P - Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) is it a new prognostic marker in resectable carcinoma stomach?
Presenter: Girish M. S
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
156P - A positive feedback between IDO1 metabolite and COL12A1 via MAPK pathway to promote gastric cancer metastasis
Presenter: Zhen Xiang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
157P - Lymph node ratio (LNR) a better prognostic factor after D2 gastrectomy
Presenter: Jitin Yadav
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
158P - A clinical significance of preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer
Presenter: Kim Jinkook
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
159P - The relation between obesity and cancer of gastrointestinal tract in Korea: The data from Statistic Korea between 2001 and 2016
Presenter: Hee Man Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
160P - Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy after progression on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jooyoung Ha
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
161P - Chitinase 3-Like 1 gene (T/C) polymorphism and serum YKL-40 in hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Alshimaa Alhanafy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
162P - Hypofractionated radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: Treatment response and prognostic factors affecting survival
Presenter: In Young Jo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
163P - Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 and 2 (ERCC1/2) Single nucleotide polymorphisms and chemotherapy treatment outcome in Cholangiocarcinoma
Presenter: Thanachai Sanlung
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
164P - Multi-centered phase II trial of weekly 5-FU plus l-LV regimen as salvage line chemotherapy for oral fluorouracil resistant advanced gastric cancer (HGCSG1502)
Presenter: Yusuke Sasaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract