Abstract 91P
Background
To estimate the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II and III colon adenocarcinoma, we use a propensity score-matched (PSM), nationwide, population-based cohort study to estimate different adjuvant treatments in high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma.
Methods
We minimized the confounding effects with PSM of sex, age, pathologic stages, tumor locations, total cycles of chemotherapy, and Charlson comorbidity index in various adjuvant treatments outcomes in patients with high-risk stage II and III resctable colon adenocarcinoma from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database by dividing them as follows: group 1, those undergoing surgery alone; group 2, those undergoing adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone; group 3, those receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) and group 4 those receiving adjuvant folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan (FOFIRIL).
Results
In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, adjusted HRs (aHRs) derived for mortality and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), reported as aHR (95% CI), derived for surgery alone, adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone, and adjuvant FOLFIRI groups compared with the adjuvant FOLFOX group were 1.55 (1.32-1.82), 1.22 (1.05-1.43), and 2.97 (2.43-3.63), respectively. After stratified subgroup analysis, at high-risk stage II, the aHR (95% CI) derived for mortality was 0.52 (0.30-0.89) for the adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone group compared with the group 3.
Conclusions
Adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone were more suitable for patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma rather than other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Adjuvant FOLFOX could be the optimal regimen for patients with pathologic stage III colon adenocarcinoma whatever elderly, sex, or tumor locations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
249P - Accuracy of endometrial biopsy by Pipelle: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Jinhai Gou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
250P - Non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: Analysis of different adjuvant treatment modalities
Presenter: Gonçalo Nogueira da Costa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
251P - A prognostic index model for predicting long-term recurrence of uterine leiomyoma after initial myomectomy in women aged 18-44 years
Presenter: Xiu Ming
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
252P - Uterine sarcomas in Qatar: Clinico-pathological characteristics and treatment outcome
Presenter: Ashraf Fadlelseid
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
253P - Anti-PD-1-induced reinvigoration of tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in epithelial ovarian cancer patients is correlated with T cell factor-1
Presenter: Junsik Park
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
254P - Cyclin E1 is a shared biomarker of subsets of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and basal like breast cancer (BLBC)
Presenter: Diar Aziz
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
255P - MEX3A is a prognostic biomarker and correlates with RNA splicing and cell proliferation in endometrial cancer by analysis of RNA-seq data
Presenter: Huining Jing
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
256P - Lnc-AL445665.1-4 may be involved in the development of multiple uterine leiomyoma through interacting with miR-146b-5p
Presenter: E Yang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
257P - Treatment results of low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) from a tertiary hospital, Chennai, India
Presenter: Rakesh M. P
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
258P - Assessment of sexual health in patients treated for ovarian cancer
Presenter: Renu Madan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract