Abstract 524P
Background
Recurrence is a rule after 1st line therapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients who would not tolerate platinum or who recur within 6 months of 1st line therapy; choice of 2nd line is not well defined in them.
Methods
SCLC patients, who progressed within 6 months after 1st line, or at anytime but who are not candidates for platinum, were non-randomly assigned to receive Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly or Irinotecan 100mg/m2 weekly, till progression or for 12 cycles, or Temozolomide 75mg/m2 21days, every 4 weekly for 6 cycles in patients with brain metastasis. Response, toxicities, survival durations were noted.
Results
In Irinotecan arm 1(12.5%) had PR, 2(25%) had SD and 3(37.5%) had PD (Response rate[RR]=37.5%). In the Taxane arm, 2(9.5%) had CR, 8(38.0%) had PR, 5(23.8%) had SD, and 6(28.5%) had PD (RR = 71.4%). 2(33.3%) had PR, 1(16.6%) had SD (RR = 50%) in the Temozolomade arm. Mean and median PFS after 2nd line after a min follow up of 18 months was 2.27 and 1.5 months for the whole cohort. Same for Taxane, Irinotecan and Temozolomide were (3.04 and 3 months), (0.81 and 0 months) and (1.5 and 0 months) respectively (p = 0.035). HR for progression for Taxane and Irinotecan were (0.565 p = 0.24, 95% CI [0.218-1.464]) and (1.358 p = 0.575, 95% CI [0.466-3.957]) respectively. Avg grade ¾ haematologic toxicities, febrile neutropenia, GI and hepatotoxicities were lowest for Taxane (0.81/patient p = 0.001, 0.48/patient p = 0.047, 1.14/patient p = 0.137 and 0.19/patient p = 0.08 respectively). Hypersensitivity (all grades) were more common for Irinotecan than taxane (0.62 vs 0.33/patient, p = 0.196). 3 patients died of causes attributed to therapy (2 out of 8 [25%] of Irinotecan arm, 1 out of 21 [4.7%] of Taxane arm). Median OS for the whole cohort was 11.5 months; highest for Taxane 12.5 months> 11 months for Temozolomide>9.5 months for Irinotecan, p = 0.185. HR for death for Taxane and Irinotecan were (0.643 p = 0.376, 95% CI [0.242-1.710]) and (1.383 p = 0.550, 95% CI [0.477-4.009]) respectively.
Conclusions
Weekly Paclitaxel in 2nd line may have favourable toxicity profile and response rate comparable to Irinotecan or Temozolomide; may translate into better quality of life and OS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
220P - An outcome analysis of robotassisted radical nephroureterectomy with extended template lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Ashwin Tamhankar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
221P - Comparative analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective real-world evidence
Presenter: Hsiang‐Lan Lai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
222P - Does tumor grade really improve the prognostic ability of the staging system for men with penile cancer: A SEER database analysis
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
223TiP - EV-301: A phase III trial in progress evaluating enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
230P - Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC): SOLO1 China cohort
Presenter: Lingying Wu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
231P - Cost-effectiveness of olaparib vs routine surveillance in the maintenance setting for patients with BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in Singapore
Presenter: David SP Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
233P - Incorporation of correlative studies in ovarian cancers in the era of precision medicine: Assessment of accountability and utility
Presenter: Nadia Hitchen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
234P - Implementation of mainstream BRCA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer in a tertiary centre
Presenter: Edbert Wong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
235P - The efficacy of radiation therapy in ovarian carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of a population-based study
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
236P - Front-line maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: What’s next PARP inhibitors?
Presenter: Han Gong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract