Abstract 485P
Background
Afatinib is indicated for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive (M+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LUX-Lung trials have demonstrated that afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy. We report results from a retrospective study of first-line afatinib in Korean patients with EGFR M+ NSCLC in real-world setting of two hospitals in South Korea.
Methods
Clinical data of Korean patients with stage IV EGFR M+ NSCLC who received first-line afatinib treatment in Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital and Pusan National University Hospital between February 2015 to December 2016 were obtained. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, and tolerability were assessed. The treatment response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and the differences in survival were assessed by log-rank test.
Results
A total of 99 eligible patients were enrolled for analysis. Mean age was 68 years (range: 35-83 years) and 56.6% were female. A total of 96.0% patients were histologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma with 52.0% brain metastases (BM). ORR was 63.4% and DCR was 93.5%. Intracranial response was 69.6% in patients treated with afatinib plus local therapy and 55.0% with afatinib therapy alone. Median PFS reached 15.1 (95% CI: 12.6-17.4) months in overall, 12.6 (9.9-14.5) months in exon 19 deletion, 16.9 (12.5-21.1) months in exon 21 L858R mutation, 13.1 (1.9 to 22.3) months in rare mutations, 18.6 (14.9-24.2) months in BM absent, and 12.2 (10.9-15.2) months BM present. There is no significantly difference between PFS either by mutation types or by BM status. The most common Grade ≥3 side effects were skin rash/acne (15.2%), and diarrhea (10.1%).
Conclusions
This study indicates that the clinical outcomes achieved with first-line afatinib in Korean patients in real-world setting appear to be better than observed from the LUX-Lung studies. Afatinib can also provide a good intracranial response in patients with brain metastases regardless of whether or not they also receive local treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Dr. Luke for the review and helpful comments for this study.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract