Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

123P - Associations between N-cadherin (N-cad) as an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker and androgen (AR) and estrogen receptors (ER) expression in prostate cancer (PCa)

Date

15 Oct 2022

Session

Poster display session

Presenters

Marina Puchinskaya

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_8): S1383-S1430. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1095

Authors

M. Puchinskaya

Author affiliations

  • MInsk City Clinical Cancer Centre, Minsk/BY

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 123P

Background

EMT is an important mechanism of cancer progression and its regulation is crucial to understand for better treatment strategies. Androgens and estrogens are known regulators of PCa. The role of their receptors (AR, ERα, ERβ) in regulating EMT in PCa is still controversial. The aim was to assess possible links between levels of those receptors and N-cad as an EMT marker in PCa.

Methods

A training cohort of 28 radical prostatectomy samples was studied. N-cad neoexpression was used as an EMT marker. Double immunofluorescent staining was used. Sections were stained with primary rabbit polyclonal antibodies to N-cad and ERβ, mouse monoclonal to AR and ERα. Secondary antibodies were labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 and 555 dyes. Total staining score (TSS) for AR, ERα, ERβ was got by multiplication of semiquantitative assessments (0-3) of proportion of stained cells and staining intensity for each high power field with mean TSS calculated for a whole case. Weighed staining index (WSI) for N-cad took into account both proportion of positive cells per case and of them percentages of cells with weak, moderate and strong membranous staining.

Results

Tumors were divided into N-cad negative (<10% positive cells) (n=18) and positive (>10%) (n=10). In N-cad positive cases AR TSS appeared to be significantly higher (4.59 vs. 2.81, pMann-Whitney=0.03). When N-cad WSI was correlated with AR and both ER subtypes mean TSS (in cancer epithelium or stroma), no correlation reached statistical significance, possibly due to relatively low number of cases, but, notably, correlations were negative for N-cad and ER subtypes both in stroma and epithelium, and positive for N-cad and epithelial AR (pSpearman>0.05).

Conclusions

AR expression in PCa was higher in cases with high numbers of EMT cells as defined by N-cad expression, assuming positive role of AR in EMT development in PCa. There was a tendency to negative correlation between both ERα and ERβ expression with N-cad, thus estrogens may down-regulate EMT in clinical samples. Relative levels of receptors may also be important, so more analyses in a larger sample cohort are ongoing to obtain data with possible predictive role to hormonal therapy efficacy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

M. Puchinskaya.

Funding

Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research, Grant No. M14M-143, M19M-123.

Disclosure

M. Puchinskaya: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.