Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

88P - Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) + Lenvatinib(len) and tislelizumab(tis) ±transhepatic arterial embolization(TAE) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT) and high tumor-burden: A multicenter retrospective study

Date

08 Dec 2022

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

WENBO GUO

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 16 (suppl_1): 100102-100102. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100102

Authors

W. GUO1, S. Chen2

Author affiliations

  • 1 the first affiliated hospital, sun yat-sen university, Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 sun yat-set university cancer center, guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 88P

Background

The triple combination therapy of HAIC combined with len. and ICIs showed promising results for advanced uHCC comparing with duplex treatment. However, for high tumor-burden lesions, the triple combination therapy is still insufficient in reduce tumor burden without TAE. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of quadruple combination therapy comparing to the triple combination therapy.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised consecutive patients who had a primary uHCC with PVTT and high tumor-burden (max nodule diameter >10cm) from Jan 2019 to Feb 2022 in four Chinese medical centers. These pats were treated with either quadruple combination therapy (TAE, HAIC, len and tis; THLP group) or triple combination therapy (HAIC, len and tis; HLP group). HAIC involved oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). Efficacy was evaluated according to OS, PFS, ORRDCR. Besides, treatment-related AEs were compared.

Results

In total, 100 patients were included in this study: 50 patients in the THLP group and the remaining 50 patients in the HLP group respectively, which resulted in a 1:1 ratio between two groups. The median follow-up was 10.8 months (range, 4.6-20.2 m). The THLP group showed OS (14.1 vs 11.3 m; hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% CI, 0.37-0.99; p=0.044), PFS (5.6 vs 4.4 month; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.98; p=0.039), and a higher objective response rate (mRECIST: 72% vs 52%, p=0.039; RECIST 1.1: 60% vs 40%, p=0.046) than the HLP group. As for the DCR, though there was no significant difference, the THLP group was higher than the HLP group (mRECIST: 88% vs 76%, p=0.118; RECIST 1.1: 86% vs 72%, p=0.086). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were more frequent in the THLP group than in the HLP group including abdominal pain (34% vs 18%), Nausea (36% vs 22%), and elevated transaminases (10% vs 2%), but there AEs were completely controllable and no treatment-related death happened.

Conclusions

Additional TAE to triple combination therapy of HAIC, len and tis might improve prognosis compared with triple combination therapy and had accepted toxic effects.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

BeiGene Ltd.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.