Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

261 - Evaluating safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in elderly patients (pts) for advanced cancer treatment: A retrospective study

Date

14 Dec 2018

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Sam Brixius

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_10): x17-x23. 10.1093/annonc/mdy486

Authors

S.J. Brixius1, F. Meiss2, D. von Bubnoff2, R. Zeiser1, C.F. Waller1, J. Duyster1, J. Rawluk1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Hematology, Oncology And Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, 79106 - Freiburg/DE
  • 2 Department Of Dermatology & Venereology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg; Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, 79104 - Freiburg/DE
More

Resources

Abstract 261

Background

Older pts with cancer require special consideration with respect to cancer treatment due to multiple comorbidities and an altered immune status. However, older pts are often under-represented in clinical trials, so information about the use of ICIs in elderly pts is marginal.

Methods

We retrospectively identified cancer pts aged over 70 yrs treated with any ICI between 04/2012 and 04/2018. Tumor entities, laboratory parameters, steroid use, adverse events (AE) as well as survival and therapy data were compared.

Results

176 pts were included (120 M, 56 F), the median age was 75 yrs (range 70-89) with 89 pts aged 75 or younger (%) and 87 pts over 75 (%). 38 pts (22%) had ECOG 0, 100 pts (57%) had ECOG 1, 23 pts had ECOG 2-3 (13%), in 15 pts (8%) data was not available. 175 pts (99%) had preexisting medical problems. Assessed by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G), 100 pts (57%) had severe comorbidities in at least one, 43 pts (24%) in at least two organ systems. 76 pts (43%) had no severe comorbidities. 89 pts (51%) had malignant melanoma, 62 (35%) non-small cell lung cancer and 8 (5%) renal-cell carcinoma. 155 pts (93%) were in a metastasized stage. 81 pts (46%) received pembrolizumab, 72 (41%) nivolumab, 35 (20%) ipilimumab, 3 (2%) atezolizumab, 1 (0.6%) durvalumab and azacitidin and 6 pts (3%) were treated with a combination of anti-PD(L)1- and anti-CTLA4-antibodies. 19pts (11%) received various consecutive ICIs. An average immunotherapy consisted of 10.2 doses (range 1-52 doses) and took 6.5 months (range 1 day – 3.9 yrs). 152 pts (86%) had AEs. 59 (34%) had severe AEs (CTCAE grad 3-4) and 63 pts (36%) required systemic corticosteroids due to AEs. We observed common described immune related AEs in 82 pts (47%). Therapy discontinuations due to AEs were in 35 pts (20%), in 23 pts (13%) the ICI was definitely stopped. We note a disease control rate (DCR) of 60% (21pts CR; 60pts PR, 67 pts SD) in the follow-up CT scans. The median survival under ICI was 11.8 months (range 5 days – 4.6 yrs).

Conclusions

Our data encourage that the use of ICI in elderly is beneficial even though AEs are commonly reported and potentially harmful.

Editorial acknowledgement

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.