Abstract 58P
Background
Nal-IRI combined with 5-FU/LV has been explored as a second-line treatment for BTC following progression on gemcitabine-based therapy in the randomized Korean NIFTY and German NALIRICC trials. Despite their similar designs, these studies reported conflicting outcomes, necessitating a comprehensive pooled analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination.
Methods
Individual patient-level data were pooled from the ITT populations of the NIFTY and NALIRICC trials. Patients received nal-IRI (70 mg/m2) D1 plus LV (400 mg/m2) D1 and 5-FU (2400 mg/m2) D1-2, or 5-FU/LV alone, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rates (ORR), and safety profile.
Results
A total of 278 patients were included with 137 in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 141 in the 5-FU/LV group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between two groups, with the majority (95%) previously treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group showed significantly longer median PFS (3.6 mo [95% CI, 2.7-4.4] vs 1.8 mo (95% CI, 1.5-2.6), HR 0.65 [95% CI, 0.51-0.84], p<0.001) and a trend toward improved median OS (8.1 mo [95% CI, 6.0-8.9] vs 6.1 mo [95% CI, 5.3-7.5], HR 0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.00], p=0.051). ORR was also higher in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (17.5% vs 2.8%) than the 5-FU/LV group (p<0.001). Notably, adverse events varied by ethnicity, with gastrointestinal toxicities and neutropenia more common in Caucasian and Asian cohorts, respectively. There were different patterns of dose modification between Caucasian and Asian cohorts; dose reduction occurred in 33.3% vs 67.0%; and treatment discontinuation without disease progression in 31.3% vs 8.0%, respectively.
Conclusions
Nal-IRI combined with 5-FU/LV significantly improved PFS and ORR in patients who progressed after gemcitabine-based therapy, indicating its potential as a standard second-line treatment. Differences in safety profiles across ethnicities underscore the need for tailored treatment approaches.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03542508, NCT03464968.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
C. Yoo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, Celgene, Eisai, Ipsen, Servier, Roche, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Genentech. A. Vogel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Mannheim, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Tyra, Tahio; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Roche, MSD, BeiGene, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicines. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13
1997P - Novel biomarker, ephrinB2 (B2), predicts resistance to treatment and poor overall survival (OS) metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Sarmad Sadeghi
Session: Poster session 13