Abstract 1007P
Background
This research compared the relative efficacy of lenvatinib monotherapy (mono), a standard of care for treatment of uHCC, versus approved / anticipated comparators. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and an NMA, updated evidence for lenvatinib mono from LEAP-002, in addition to evidence from REFLECT, were included in the analyses.
Methods
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via systematic literature review. REFLECT and LEAP-002 investigated lenvatinib mono in uHCC, with patient-level data available for each, however, only REFLECT had a comparator arm of interest. To utilise all available lenvatinib data, the lenvatinib arm from LEAP-002 was adjusted to match aggregate data for confounding factors from REFLECT using IPTW. Weighted Cox regression including matching variables as covariates were used to derive hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) comparing lenvatinib and sorafenib. The estimated HRs were included in fixed-effects Bayesian NMAs to compare lenvatinib and comparators. Scenario analyses explored alternative choices for IPTW estimators.
Results
Eight RCTs (including REFLECT) and adjusted data from LEAP-002, were included in the NMA. Lenvatinib demonstrated a significant improvement in OS compared with sorafenib, and significant improvement in PFS compared with sorafenib, tremelimumab + durvalumab, tislelizumab and durvalumab (Table).
Table: 1007P
NMA results for OS and PFS – lenvatinib vs comparator
Comparator | OS; median HR (95% CrI) | PFS; median HR (95% CrI) |
Sorafenib | 0.75 (0.66, 0.86) | 0.57 (0.49, 0.66) |
Durvalumab | 0.88 (0.71, 1.08) | 0.55 (0.45, 0.69) |
Tislelizumab | 0.88 (0.71, 1.11) | 0.51 (0.41, 0.65) |
Tremelimumab 300 mg + durvalumab | 0.97 (0.77, 1.20) | 0.63 (0.51, 0.78) |
Atezolizumab + bevacizumab | 1.14 (0.86, 1.51) | 0.87 (0.67, 1.13) |
Camrelizumab + apatinib | 1.21 (0.92, 1.60) | 1.09 (0.82, 1.44) |
Bold = significant resultAbbreviations: Crl, credible interval; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival
Conclusions
These results suggest that patients with uHCC treated with lenvatinib mono have similar or significantly improved OS and PFS when compared with other therapies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
D. Trueman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Source Health economics employees were commissioned by Eisai Inc. to perform this analysis.: Source Health Economics. K. Ndirangu: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Eisai. A. Paine: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Source Health economics employees were commissioned by Eisai Inc. to perform this analysis.: Source Health Economics. H. Pilkington: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Source Health economics employees were commissioned by Eisai Inc. to perform this analysis.: Source Health Economics.
Resources from the same session
998P - Efficacy and safety of curative hepatectomy after conversion therapies for initial unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching study
Presenter: Rong-yun Mai
Session: Poster session 18
1000P - Real-world clinical outcomes of cabozantinib (cabo) as a second-line (2L) treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Daniel Ahn
Session: Poster session 18
1001P - Patients’ prioritization of treatment goals in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A global qualitative observational study (PERIDOT)
Presenter: Marcus-Alexander Wörns
Session: Poster session 18
1002P - Efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with TKIs and FOLFOX4-HAIC in conversion therapy of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Kai Tan
Session: Poster session 18
1003P - Efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) versus dual combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Omar Maaño
Session: Poster session 18
1004P - Comparative efficacy of systemic sequential regorafenib after sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment failure for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, multi-center, real-world study
Presenter: Danjun Song
Session: Poster session 18
1005P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden
Presenter: Jiliang Qiu
Session: Poster session 18
1006P - Associations of online search trends and prescription trends for hepatocellular carcinoma drugs
Presenter: Philipp Berning
Session: Poster session 18