Abstract 1007P
Background
This research compared the relative efficacy of lenvatinib monotherapy (mono), a standard of care for treatment of uHCC, versus approved / anticipated comparators. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and an NMA, updated evidence for lenvatinib mono from LEAP-002, in addition to evidence from REFLECT, were included in the analyses.
Methods
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via systematic literature review. REFLECT and LEAP-002 investigated lenvatinib mono in uHCC, with patient-level data available for each, however, only REFLECT had a comparator arm of interest. To utilise all available lenvatinib data, the lenvatinib arm from LEAP-002 was adjusted to match aggregate data for confounding factors from REFLECT using IPTW. Weighted Cox regression including matching variables as covariates were used to derive hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) comparing lenvatinib and sorafenib. The estimated HRs were included in fixed-effects Bayesian NMAs to compare lenvatinib and comparators. Scenario analyses explored alternative choices for IPTW estimators.
Results
Eight RCTs (including REFLECT) and adjusted data from LEAP-002, were included in the NMA. Lenvatinib demonstrated a significant improvement in OS compared with sorafenib, and significant improvement in PFS compared with sorafenib, tremelimumab + durvalumab, tislelizumab and durvalumab (Table).
Table: 1007P
NMA results for OS and PFS – lenvatinib vs comparator
Comparator | OS; median HR (95% CrI) | PFS; median HR (95% CrI) |
Sorafenib | 0.75 (0.66, 0.86) | 0.57 (0.49, 0.66) |
Durvalumab | 0.88 (0.71, 1.08) | 0.55 (0.45, 0.69) |
Tislelizumab | 0.88 (0.71, 1.11) | 0.51 (0.41, 0.65) |
Tremelimumab 300 mg + durvalumab | 0.97 (0.77, 1.20) | 0.63 (0.51, 0.78) |
Atezolizumab + bevacizumab | 1.14 (0.86, 1.51) | 0.87 (0.67, 1.13) |
Camrelizumab + apatinib | 1.21 (0.92, 1.60) | 1.09 (0.82, 1.44) |
Bold = significant resultAbbreviations: Crl, credible interval; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival
Conclusions
These results suggest that patients with uHCC treated with lenvatinib mono have similar or significantly improved OS and PFS when compared with other therapies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
D. Trueman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Source Health economics employees were commissioned by Eisai Inc. to perform this analysis.: Source Health Economics. K. Ndirangu: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Eisai. A. Paine: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Source Health economics employees were commissioned by Eisai Inc. to perform this analysis.: Source Health Economics. H. Pilkington: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Source Health economics employees were commissioned by Eisai Inc. to perform this analysis.: Source Health Economics.
Resources from the same session
978P - Post-progression outcomes of advanced HCC patients (aHCC pts) treated with first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B)
Presenter: Claudia Fulgenzi
Session: Poster session 18
979P - Safety interim analyses of first-line systemic therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ+BEV) in patients from Spain with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase IIIb ATHECA
Presenter: Maria Elisa Reig Monzon
Session: Poster session 18
980P - Neutrophil count predicts the complete response after transarterial chemoembolization related to favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Young Mi Hong
Session: Poster session 18
981P - The response of portal vein tumoral thrombosis to moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy using intensity modulated radiotherapy
Presenter: Ahmad Abdel-Azeez
Session: Poster session 18
982P - Transarterial chemoembolization with idarubicin versus epirubicin for hepatocellular carcinoma: An interim analysis of a multicentre, randomized controlled phase III trial
Presenter: Zhewei Zhang
Session: Poster session 18
983P - Safety and efficacy of durvalumab plus hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in HCC with severe portal vein tumor thrombosis (Vp3/4) – the DurHope study
Presenter: Ming Zhao
Session: Poster session 18
984P - Comparative study of scoring systems predicting outcome of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study
Presenter: Jo Kook Lee
Session: Poster session 18
987P - Safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-world practice in Korea
Presenter: Wonseok Kang
Session: Poster session 18