Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 2

4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side

Date

29 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 2

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Camila Araujo de Carvalho

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v198-v252. 10.1093/annonc/mdz246

Authors

C.S. Araujo de Carvalho, C.M.V. Moniz, G.Y. Watarai, J.A.R. Crespo, P.V.D.S. Nogueira, J.K. Martinez, P.M.G.D. Moraes, R.R.D.C.C. Bonadio, M.I.F.M. Braghiroli, J. Sabbaga, P.M.G. Hoff

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, ICESP - Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, 01246-000 - Sao Paulo/BR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 4741

Background

Although controversial, available data suggest a possible benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). The impact of sidedness and adjuvant CT duration in this setting is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of high-risk stage II CRC patients (pts).

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of pts with stage II CRC treated between Jan/2011 and Dec/2018. Study data were collected using REDCap®. We compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of high-risk pts who received or not adjuvant CT. High-risk was at least one of the following: T4 stage, < 12 lymph nodes resection, emergency presentation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion or poor differentiation. CT consisted of fluoropyrimidine alone. Pts with known microsatellite instability were excluded. Survival analyses were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Prognostic factors, including tumor side and duration of CT, were evaluated with Cox regression.

Results

1047 pts with stage II CRC were evaluated, and 540 had high-risk criteria.157 (29%) pts had right tumor and 352 (65.2%) left. 335 (62%) received adjuvant CT. Duration of CT was 3 – 6 months for 305 (91%) pts. Pts who received adjuvant CT had superior RFS and OS in comparison with those who did not receive adjuvant CT (5-year RFS: 75.5% vs 65.6%, HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41 – 0.82, P = 0.002; 5-year OS: 87.7% vs 76.1%, HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28 – 0.73, P = 0.001). No difference in RFS and OS was observed according to tumor side (left vs right, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56 – 1.31, P = 0.494). Prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were: T4 stage (HR 2.29, P = 0.002), emergency presentation (HR 2.44, P = 0.001), perineural invasion (HR 1.84, P = 0.025), and adjuvant CT (HR 0.45, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Adjuvant CT was associated with improved RFS and OS in patients with high-risk stage II CRC, with a total gain of 11.6% in 5-year OS. Tumor side did not influence the outcomes in this study.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Camila Soares Araujo de Carvalho.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.