Abstract 1428
Background
HER2 blockade in combination with chemotherapy (CT) remains the treatment of choice for patients with early HER2+ BC, irrespective of ER status. Patients with HER2+ early BC co-expressing ER may benefit from HER2 blockade in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) and new targeted agents. Elderly patients benefit from HER2 blockade as much as younger ones but they have higher risks of adverse events, mostly induced by the CT partner, making de-escalation of CT appealing. Recent data have elucidated cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) as key therapeutic targets functioning downstream of both ER and HER2 pathways suggesting CDK4/6 inhibitors like Pal may be ideal partners for ET in this context. Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that a gene signature of functional loss of Retinoblastoma (RBsig) might predict sensitivity to CT vs CDK4/6i in ER+/HER2+ early BC. The TOUCH hypothesis is that neoadjuvant therapy with Pal + ET + dual HER2 blockade may be more active in patients with ER+/HER2+ RBsig LOW early BC while those with RBsig HIGH may require CT.
Trial design
TOUCH is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 neoadjuvant trial. 144 patients ≥65 years with ER+/HER2+ primary BC will be randomized (1:1) to dual HER2 blockade (5 doses T+P) + either Pal (125 mg/d po; 21 of 28d x 4 cycles) + L (daily x 16 weeks), or Pac (80 mg/m2 iv, d1,8,15 q28 days x 4 cycles), before surgery. RBsig (HIGH vs LOW) will be determined centrally on mandatory pre-treatment biopsies. Baseline geriatric assessment includes G8, Instrumental Activity of Daily Living, Charlson comorbidity index. The primary objective is to explore the interaction between RBsig and treatment activity assessed by pathological complete response (pCR). Exact logistic regression will test RBsig by treatment interaction (2-sided a=.05) and estimate odds ratios (OR) for pCR. The sample size provides 86% power, assuming an overall pCR rate of 26%, and OR = 2.4 vs OR = 0.11 for RBsig LOW vs HIGH. Accrual began April 2019.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03644186.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
International Breast Cancer Study Group.
Funding
Pfizer, Roche.
Disclosure
L. Biganzoli: Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Genomic Health; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genomic Health; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. E. Brain: Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Roche; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: BMS; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Celgene; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Clinigen; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Hospira; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Janssen; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Mylan; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: OBI Pharma; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Puma; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Samsung. L. Malorni: Research grant / Funding (self), research funding and consulting fees: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4906 - Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A restrospective study
Presenter: Sara Giovannoni
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3919 - Prognostic significance of elements of the adaptive immunity in the microenvironment of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Presenter: Periklis Foukas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5139 - Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts platinum sensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a MITO24 retrospective study
Presenter: Alberto Farolfi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4212 - The prognostic impact of monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)
Presenter: Marc Cucurull Salamero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5123 - TP53 Hotspot mutations as immunoreactive neoantigens define a signature with differential survival outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer
Presenter: Marica Garziera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3795 - Use of bevacizumab (Bev) in real life for first-line (fl) treatment of ovarian cancer (OC)/ The GINECO ENCOURAGE cohort of 500 French patients
Presenter: Dominique Berton-Rigaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2359 - Phase II study: Letrozole maintenance therapy after first line chemotherapy in patients with advanced serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer
Presenter: Alexandra Tyulyandina
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3619 - Baseline IPI (Immune Prognostic Index) predicts survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
Presenter: Felix Blanc-Durand
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3474 - Preselecting tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subsets to implement adoptive inmmunotherapy in ovarian cancer
Presenter: Diego Salas-Benito
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5134 - Early prediction of the platinum-resistant relapse risk using the CA125 modeled kinetic parameter KELIM: a pooled analysis of AGO-OVAR 7 & 9; ICON 7 (AGO/GINECO/ MRC CTU/GCIG trials).
Presenter: OLIVIER COLOMBAN
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract