Abstract 2342
Background
The FIRSTANA trial compared docetaxel 75mg/m2 Q3W (D75), cabazitaxel 20mg/m2 Q3W (C20) and cabazitaxel 25mg/m2 Q3W (C25) in patients with chemo-naive mCRPC (Oudard 2017). FIRSTANA enrolled patients regardless of presence of disease-related symptoms. This post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA evaluates the influence of progression type on outcomes.
Methods
Patient outcomes (OS, PSA response [confirmed PSA decline from baseline ≥ 50%] and radiological PFS [rPFS]) were analyzed according to progression type at randomization. Progression at randomization was defined as follows: PSA progression only (PSA-p) with no radiological progression (Radio-p) and no pain, Radio-p (± PSA-p, no pain), pain progression (mean Present Pain Intensity ≥2 and/or mean analgesic score ≥ 10 over the 7 days prior to randomization (±PSA-p, ±Radio-p).
Results
PSA-p, Radio-p and Pain-p were present in 34.4%, 23.2% and 42.3% of patients at randomization, respectively. Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy was associated with features of aggressive disease and a shorter OS. Lower activity of C20 than C25 and D75 was observed in patients with Pain-p.Table:
859P
Progression type | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSA-p N = 362 | Radio-p N = 244 | Pain-p N = 445 | Global p° | |
- PSA decrease ≥ 50% - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 69.0% 67.4% 71.0% 69.0% | 69.8% 65.8% 66.2% 78.3% | 58.0% 62.2% 49.3% 63.0% | P = 0.003 P = 0.70 P = 0.002 P = 0.21 |
-rPFS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 16.5 [14.3; 18.9] 13.5 [11.3; 16.7] 19.7 [14.3; 26.5] 18.2 [14.2; 22.6] | 12.1 [11.2; 14.4] 11.3 [9.7; 14.4] 13.4 [10.6; 22.8] 11.4 [10.1; 15.7] | 10.8 [9.3;11.6] 11.4 [8.8; 13.9] 9.1 [7.6; 10.9] 11.1 [9.7; 12.8] | p < 0.001 p = 0.13 p < 0.001 p = 0.001 |
OS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 27.7 [25.4;31.2] 29.0 [22.6; 36.6] 30.0 [24.9; NR] 26.5 [24.0; 31.6] | 30.6 [26.8;34.3] 28.4 [22.0; 34.1] 32.1 [27.9; 41.4] 29.7 [24.0; 38.5] | 18.5 [16.8; 20.6] 20.3[16.5;24.3] 16.5[14.3; 19.1] 20.4[17.0;25.3] | p < 0.001 p = 0.003 p < 0.001 p = 0.031 |
in months, NR: not reached; °Log rank test for rPFS and OS, CMH test adjusted on stratification factors
Conclusions
Most patients in FIRSTANA had pain progression at randomization and this factor was associated with worse OS. In this post-hoc, subgroup analysis, C20 appeared less active than D75 and C25 in men with baseline pain progression.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nicolas Delanoy.
Funding
Sanofi.
Disclosure
N. Delanoy: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self): MSD. D. Robbrecht: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. K. Fizazi: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Astellas; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Clovis; Honoraria (self): CureVac; Honoraria (self): Essa; Honoraria (self): Genentech; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Orion; Honoraria (self): Sanofi. F. Mercier: Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Stat Process is a CRO providing statistical services to various companies: Stat Process. O. Sartor: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Eli Lilly; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: GlaxoSmithKline; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Noria; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bellicum; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Johnson &Johnson; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Dendreon; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Endocyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Constellation Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy: Advanced Accelerator Applications; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Bavarian Nordic; Advisory / Consultancy: Oncogenex; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Progenics. R. de Wit: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech. S. Oudard: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Ipsen.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract