Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2670 - Molecular subtypes of metastatic(met) gastric cancer(GC) (MoTriGastric): new biomarkers closer to the clinics
Presenter: Maria Alsina Maqueda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3797 - Exploring candidate signal transduction pathways for targeted therapy in esophageal cancer
Presenter: Aafke Creemers
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5485 - Clinical implication of CLDN18, RhoGAP, and E-cadherin in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma
Presenter: Hyunho Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1970 - Identification of a spectrum of germline mutations for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer in the Russian population by next-generation sequencing.
Presenter: IRINA EFIMOVA
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4989 - The molecular profiling and prognostic value of Chinese gastric signet ring cell carcinoma patients
Presenter: Jia Wei
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
7145 - A phase 2 basket study of MCLA-128, a bispecific antibody targeting the HER3 pathway, in NRG1 fusion-positive advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Alison Schram
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1406 - Simultaneous Resection of Pancreatic Cancer and Liver Oligometastases After Induction Chemotherapy in Stage IV Patients:an Open-Label Prospective Randomized Multicenter phase 3 trial(CSPAC-1)
Presenter: Miaoyan Wei
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1530 - Multicenter randomized phase II trial of 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) with or without liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) as second-line therapy after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis): NIFTY trial
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1563 - A randomized phase II study of Maintenance therapy with multiepitope vaccine Tedopi (OSE2101) ± nivolumab or FOLFIRI after induction chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFIRINOX in patients (Pts) with advanced Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) (TEDOPaM – PRODIGE 63 GERCOR study)
Presenter: Cindy Neuzillet
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2780 - A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study of durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: TOPAZ-1
Presenter: Do-Youn Oh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract