Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2860 - Prognostic value of metabolic response assessed by 18FDG-PET after induction chemotherapy and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients (pts) receiving definite CRT (dCRT)
Presenter: Yeonghak Bang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3881 - Comprehensive genomic profiling of early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Jing Zuo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3944 - A novel nomogram and risk classification system predicting radiation pneumonitis in patients with esophageal cancer receiving radiotherapy
Presenter: Lu Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1956 - Drinking alcohol, smoking, multiple dysplastic lesions and the risk of field cancerization of squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus and head and neck region
Presenter: Chikatoshi Katada
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2144 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can eliminate the negative impact of postoperative infectious complications on recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Kazuki Kano
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2403 - Comparison of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus definitive CRT with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in esophageal cancer
Presenter: Marcelle Cesca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3247 - Paclitaxel in Combination with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil(TPF) Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Borderline-resectable Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
Presenter: Yuhong Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4293 - Prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on local immunity evaluation
Presenter: Elena Zlatnik
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5419 - Impact of Sarcopenia and adiposity in survival of metastatic esophageal cancer (MEC)
Presenter: Aline Fares
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2083 - PALAESTRA - A phase II trial with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy as palliative treatment in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: David Borg
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract