Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3180 - Genomic analysis of hepatobiliary lithiasis associated cholangiocarcinoma revealed a distinct subtype feature.
Presenter: Lunda Gu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4891 - Comparison of the impact of stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation on liver function in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis
Presenter: Masayuki Ueno
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3203 - Exploratory analysis based on tumor location and early metabolic tumor response of REACHIN, a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled phase II trial of regorafenib after failure of gemcitabine/platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic biliary tract tumors.
Presenter: Anne Demols
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1602 - Predictive Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) And Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) In Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated with Nivolumab (N)
Presenter: Sirish Dharmapuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2848 - Preliminary Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a New Lysosomotropic Oral Agent, GNS561, in a First-in-Human Study in Advanced Primary Liver Cancer Patients
Presenter: Ahmad Awada
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1396 - A phase 1b trial of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): updated results
Presenter: Josep Llovet
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1139 - Multicentric prospective study of validation of angiogenesis-related gene polymorphisms in HCC patients treated with sorafenib: Final results of INNOVATE study
Presenter: Andrea Casadei-gardini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4688 - Prognostic and predictive factors from the phase 3 CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib (C) versus placebo (P) in previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Tim Meyer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1492 - A phase Ib study of pembrolizumab following trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): PETAL.
Presenter: David Pinato
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3159 - Anlotinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: interim results from the phase II ALTER0802 study
Presenter: AiPing Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract