Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1025 - Liver metastases (LM) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA): Outcomes from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) registry and implications on current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging.
Presenter: Angela Lamarca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5813 - Is MGMT methylation a new therapeutic target for Biliary Tract Cancer?
Presenter: Monica Niger
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5839 - Biliary Tract Cancers in Portuguese families with BRCA gene mutation: a retrospective study.
Presenter: Patricia Pereira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4338 - Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for selective internal radiation therapy based on tumour burden and liver function: a post-hoc analysis of the SARAH trial
Presenter: Daniel Palmer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1700 - Second-line chemotherapy (SLC) in Patients with Advanced Biliary tract and Gallbladder Cancers (ABGC) Prolongs Survival: A Retrospective Population-based Cohort Study
Presenter: Adnan Zaidi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5562 - Overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib versus selective internal radiation therapy with predicted dosimetry in the SARAH trial
Presenter: Neil Hawkins
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1838 - Multicenter phase II trial of axitinib monotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Naohiro Okano
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3641 - Soluble Programmed Death-ligand 1 indicate poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Presenter: Xiaolu Ma
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2733 - The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) is an independent predictor of survival in advanced biliary cancers (ABC) receiving first-line chemotherapy (1L).
Presenter: Francesco Caputo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3773 - Impact of centralisation of national cancer services on patient outcomes for hepatobiliary cancers in Ireland 2000 – 2016
Presenter: David O Reilly
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract