Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3879 - Efficacy of derazantinib (DZB) in patients (pts) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) expressing FGFR2-fusion or FGFR2 mutations/amplifications
Presenter: Michele Droz Dit Busset
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4679 - It’s Not Only About Weight Loss: Tackling Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Cachexia
Presenter: Ana Leonor Matos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2276 - Frequency and clinicopathological characteristics of biliary tract carcinomas harboring the FGFR2-fusion gene: a prospective observational study (PRELUDE study)
Presenter: Masafumi Ikeda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2773 - Post-hoc analyses of a subgroup of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) who crossed over to treatment with etoposide toniribate (EDO-S7.1) in a randomized Phase II study
Presenter: Ulrich-Frank Pape
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4479 - Capecitabine +Best supportive care (BSC) or Erlotinib +BSC has Overall survival (OS) benefit over BSC alone in unresectable/metastatic Gall bladder cancer(GBC) patients with ECOG PS-III. Results from a phase II Randomised controlled trial (RCT)
Presenter: Babita Kataria
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4843 - FGFR2 fusions and its effect of patient (pt) outcomes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)
Presenter: Daniel Almquist
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2324 - The Clinical Outcomes of Systemic Chemotherapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Combined Hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CCA): Retrospective Study of 120 Patients
Presenter: Eojin Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3678 - High PD-L1 expression is associated with treatment response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Presenter: Gilhyang Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3901 - Genomic profiling in Chinese biliary tract cancer patients with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and RAS gene mutations
Presenter: Jingyu Cao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4390 - Phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Sakti Chakrabarti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract