Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4842 - The analysis of genomic signatures of head and body/tail of pancreatic cancer in Chinese patients
Presenter: Qi Ling
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4988 - MGMT methylation in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC): a single center experience
Presenter: Monica Niger
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5035 - Advantage of three-dimensional image analysis of pancreatic cancer using computed tomography
Presenter: Seung Bae Yoon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1465 - Phase I study of the oncolytic viral immunotherapy agent Canerpaturev (C-REV) with S-1 in patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer.
Presenter: Susumu Hijioka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1982 - Impact of anatomic site of biliary tract tumour origin and conditional probability of survival (CS): results from 15 prospective advanced first-line clinical trial
Presenter: Mairead McNamara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2244 - FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFIRINOX in first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a propensity score analysis
Presenter: Angélique Vienot
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4557 - Cellfree tumor-DNA (cfDNA) as a very early predictor of therapeutic outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Presenter: Sabine Payr
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4406 - Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of gall bladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) in patients from distinct ancestral populations
Presenter: Milind Javle
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4283 - Phase II Monotherapy Efficacy of Cancer Metabolism Targeting SM-88 in Heavily Pre-Treated PDAC Patients.
Presenter: Allyson Ocean
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2078 - Comprehensive genomic profiling and clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with fibroblast growth factor receptor rearrangement-positive (FGFR2+) cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) treated with pemigatinib in the fight-202 trial
Presenter: Antoine Hollebecque
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract