Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4250 - Phase II study of avelumab in combination with cetuximab as a rechallenge strategy in pre-treated RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: CAVE (cetuximab-avelumab) Colon.
Presenter: Erika Martinelli
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5234 - The ORCHESTRA trial; A phase III trial of adding tumor debulking to systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone in multi-organ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Presenter: Lotte Bakkerus
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5294 - EMERGE: Epigenetic Modulation of the Immune Response in Gastrointestinal cancers
Presenter: Elizabeth Cartwright
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
913 - Phase III, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) alone for surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APACT): subgroup analyses
Presenter: Margaret Tempero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1668 - FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma : update of the AGEO cohort.
Presenter: Edouard Auclin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2559 - Impact of adjuvant treatment with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (nab-P+GEM) vs gemcitabine alone (GEM) on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients (pts) with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) in the Adjuvant Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (APACT)
Presenter: Hanno Riess
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4897 - Early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using methylation signatures in circulating tumor DNA
Presenter: Xiao-ding Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1755 - Evaluation of minimal important difference (MID) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Pancreatic Cancer Module (PAN26) in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Michele Reni
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2876 - Multispectral analysis of lymphocyte complexity in periampullary adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Sebastian Lundgren
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1902 - Phase II trial of preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) followed by postoperative gemcitabine (GEM) in patients (pts) with borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Presenter: Jae Ho Jeong
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract