Abstract 2145
Background
The pathological classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) has been revised based on the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 classification. Well-differentiated PanNENs were previously classified as G1, G2, or G3 according to the Ki-67 labeling index (LI), which shows the cell proliferation ability. Although the Ki67 LI cut-off for G1 and G2 was changed from ≤2% to < 3% from WHO 2010 to 2017, there are few reports on the impact of G2 tumor malignancy associated with this change.
Methods
Patients with PanNENs G1/G2 classified by WHO 2017 Ki-67 LI cut-off who underwent pancreatic resection at our institution between July 1987 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. We excluded patients with synchronous distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Their clinicopathological variables were analyzed.
Results
Sixty-two patients (median age: 58 years; range: 18–84 years) were examined. The G1/G2 groups comprised 40/22 and 48/14 patients based on WHO 2010 and 2017 classifications, respectively. Eight patients were reclassified from G2 to G1, two of which were T2 or more based on TNM classification; one patient had lymph node metastasis positivity, and all patients survived without recurrence. Disease recurrence occurred in 4/4 G1/G2 patients according to both WHO 2010 and 2017. G2 patients had shorter 5- and 10-year disease-free survivals (DFSs) than those of G1 patients based on WHO 2010 (90.9% and 90.9% vs. 84.5% and 70.4%, p = 0.179) and significantly shorter DFS based on WHO 2017 (91.9% and 91.9% vs. 78.6% and 58.9%, p = 0.036). The Ki-67 LI cut-off by ROC analysis was 3%, supporting the WHO 2017 classification. In multivariate analysis for DFS, tumor size >25 mm and vascular invasion positivity, but not G2, were risk factors for recurrence. The high-risk group with these factors had significantly worse 5- and 10-year disease-specific survivals (DSSs) compared to the low-risk group (100% and 100% vs. 90.9% and 68.2%, p = 0.045).
Conclusions
Revision of the Ki-67 LI cut-off for PanNENs G1/G2 based on WHO 2017 may be appropriate but G2 is not a risk factor for DFS. Tumor size >25 mm and vascular invasion positivity are potential risk factors. High-risk patients should be closely monitored during follow-up.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3392 - Post-hoc analysis of the nintedanib exposure-response relationships in the CHIVA trial in advanced ovarian cancer: (a GINECO study)
Presenter: Skerdi HAVIARI
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
714 - The feasibility and efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency in patient with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors
Presenter: Min Kyu Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1753 - Ex vivo cytotoxicity and in vivo antitumor activity of a novel highly selective STAT3 inhibitor YHO-1701 for ovarian and endometrial cancer
Presenter: Kosei Hasegawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3739 - Mutational landscapes and tumor mutational burden expression in endometrial cancer
Presenter: Yingli Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2109 - Clinical features and frequency of mismatch repair protein deficiency in ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma patients.
Presenter: Kazuhiro Takehara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4554 - Prospective study evaluating white adipose tissue inflammation and clinicopathologic features in endometrial cancer
Presenter: Lea Moukarzel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3645 - Cancer-specific survival with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage I endometrial cancer
Presenter: Jenny Ko
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3394 - Pembrolizumab in Patients with MSI-H Advanced Endometrial Cancer from the KEYNOTE-158 Study
Presenter: David Omalley
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3388 - Who drops out of cervical cancer screening? Results from the EDIFICE 6 survey
Presenter: Thibault de La Motte Rouge
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2485 - Identification of a RNA-Seq Based Signature to Improve Prognostic for Uterine Sarcoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract