Abstract 1814
Background
Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields that non-invasively treat cancer. Transducer arrays positioned on the skin in proximity to the targeted tumor transmit TTFields. A post-hoc analysis [Ballo et al. Red Jour. 2019 In Press] has shown that increased patient usage (percent of time on active treatment) and intensity of TTFields delivery direct to the tumor improved survival. Optimal array positioning may enhance TTFields intensity at the tumor site to improve patient experience and survival. Minimization of array exposure area would enhance patient comfort levels and usage to improve survival. Optimizing TTFields delivery and distribution depends on array positioning and geometry, patient anatomy, and the heterogeneous electrical properties of different tissues. We present methodology to optimize TTFields delivery using numerical simulations.
Methods
TTFields delivery to the brain, lung, and abdomen utilizing representative computational models was investigated. The effects of transducer array size and position on field distribution within the phantoms was analyzed, and an approach to optimize TTFields delivery was developed.
Results
Field intensity was typically the greatest in between arrays, with larger arrays transmitting higher field power. Anatomical features, such as bones (spine) or a resection cavity significantly influenced field intensity within this region. A generalized methodology to optimize TTFields delivery for improved patient care was based on: (1) Striking a balance between maximal field intensity (largest arrays feasible) and minimal skin exposure to arrays in the disease area; (2) Positioning virtual arrays on a representative, computational patient model to test tumor localization between arrays, to simulate TTFields delivery to patient, and to assess optimal delivery; and (3) Applying an iterative algorithm to shift arrays around their initial positions until field intensity is maximized directly to the tumor bed.
Conclusions
A generalized treatment methodology as presented by these data will optimize TTFields delivery to the tumor site. Effective TTFields treatment planning is expected to improve patient outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Novocure.
Funding
Novocure.
Disclosure
N. Urman: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. Z. Bomzon: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. H.S. Hershkovich: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. E.D. Kirson: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. A. Naveh: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. R. Shamir: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. E. Fedorov: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. C. Wenger: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. U. Weinberg: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract