Abstract 1814
Background
Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields that non-invasively treat cancer. Transducer arrays positioned on the skin in proximity to the targeted tumor transmit TTFields. A post-hoc analysis [Ballo et al. Red Jour. 2019 In Press] has shown that increased patient usage (percent of time on active treatment) and intensity of TTFields delivery direct to the tumor improved survival. Optimal array positioning may enhance TTFields intensity at the tumor site to improve patient experience and survival. Minimization of array exposure area would enhance patient comfort levels and usage to improve survival. Optimizing TTFields delivery and distribution depends on array positioning and geometry, patient anatomy, and the heterogeneous electrical properties of different tissues. We present methodology to optimize TTFields delivery using numerical simulations.
Methods
TTFields delivery to the brain, lung, and abdomen utilizing representative computational models was investigated. The effects of transducer array size and position on field distribution within the phantoms was analyzed, and an approach to optimize TTFields delivery was developed.
Results
Field intensity was typically the greatest in between arrays, with larger arrays transmitting higher field power. Anatomical features, such as bones (spine) or a resection cavity significantly influenced field intensity within this region. A generalized methodology to optimize TTFields delivery for improved patient care was based on: (1) Striking a balance between maximal field intensity (largest arrays feasible) and minimal skin exposure to arrays in the disease area; (2) Positioning virtual arrays on a representative, computational patient model to test tumor localization between arrays, to simulate TTFields delivery to patient, and to assess optimal delivery; and (3) Applying an iterative algorithm to shift arrays around their initial positions until field intensity is maximized directly to the tumor bed.
Conclusions
A generalized treatment methodology as presented by these data will optimize TTFields delivery to the tumor site. Effective TTFields treatment planning is expected to improve patient outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Novocure.
Funding
Novocure.
Disclosure
N. Urman: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. Z. Bomzon: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. H.S. Hershkovich: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. E.D. Kirson: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. A. Naveh: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. R. Shamir: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. E. Fedorov: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. C. Wenger: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure. U. Weinberg: Full / Part-time employment: Novocure; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novocure.
Resources from the same session
1707 - Clinical utility of precision immunoprofiling and monitoring of the tumor microenvironment using flow cytometry and CyTOF in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with atezolizumab: results from a phase II study for biomarker analysis (EPOC1702)
Presenter: Keisuke Kirita
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3594 - Tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1, IFN-γ signaling identify subgroups of patients (pts) who benefit from durvalumab (D, anti-PDL1) or D and tremelimumab (T, anti-CTLA4) treatment in urothelial bladder cancer (UC)
Presenter: Christophe Massard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
744 - The decrease of TMB, TNB and HLA expression are the Mechanism of Drug Resistance of NSCLC to immunosuppressive PD-1/PD-l1.
Presenter: Sheng Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2350 - Eosinophilia during treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) predicts succeeding onset of immune-related adverse events (irAEs)
Presenter: Rika Kizawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5930 - A transcriptomic immunologic signature predicts favorable outcome in neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated triple negative breast tumors.
Presenter: Javier Pérez-peña
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6127 - Alterations of TMB and TCR repertoires during Chemotherapy in East Asian lung cancer patients without TKI-related driver gene mutations
Presenter: Lele Song
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1310 - Association of SCFA in gut microbiome and clinical response in solid cancer patients treated with andi-PD-1 antibody.
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2286 - Extracellular matrix and tissue derived metabolites in a liquid biopsy identifies endotypes of metastatic melanoma patients with differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment
Presenter: Nicholas Willumsen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4107 - Pathologic scoring of pre-treatment H&E biopsies predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab monotherapy
Presenter: Julie Stein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1291 - PD-L1 expression in uncommon EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and its response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Yun Fan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract