Abstract 1524
Background
Treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC has been revolutionized with the development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Three generations of TKIs are now available (1st: erlotinib, gefitinib; 2nd: afatinib, dacomitinib; 3rd: osimertinib). Osimertinib has been developed as second-line treatment after a first-line TKI 1G or 2G when patients progressed with T790M-positive tumors, the most frequent mechanism of resistance. While osimertinib may also be given as first-line treatment, limited data exists on the real life effectiveness of the TKIs sequencing approach: TKI 1G or 2G followed by osimertinib. The French National medico administrative claim database (SNDS) offers the opportunity to estimate the effectiveness parameters for these patients in France.
Methods
Based on SNDS, a historic cohort of patients with a diagnosis of EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated, after a first-line with a TKI 1G or 2G, with osimertinib in second-line between 2015 and 2017 was extracted. Follow-up was conducted until December 31st 2017. Patients’ characteristics, Time on treatments and Overall survival were analysed.
Results
1,404 NSCLC patients have been treated with osimertinib in the database between 2015 and 2017. Among them, 509 had a previous treatment with TKI 1G or 2G without any other anticancer drug before osimertinib initiation, and constitute the analysed population. Mean age was 70.9 (29.1% were above 80 years old), 25.7% were males. Median time on TKI treatment (between the beginning of the first TKI 1G or 2G until discontinuation of osimertinib) was not reached but the percentages of patients still treated were: 83.8% at 24 months and 75.5% at 36 months. Median overall survival was not reached but the percentages of patients still alive were: 79.6% at 24 months and 70.3% at 36 months. Updated data will be presented at the meeting.
Conclusions
Our cohort confirms the prolonged time on TKI treatment and survival rates of patients receiving TKI 1G or 2G followed by osimertinib in a real life setting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Disclosure
N. Girard: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): GlaxoSmithKline; Honoraria (self): Hoffmann La Roche; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Merck Sharp Dohme; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Takeda. S. Bouee: Full / Part-time employment: CEMKA. D. Moro-Sibilot: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution): Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. C. Emery: Full / Part-time employment, CEMKA received a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim to perform the statistical analysis of this study : CEMKA. K. Le Lay: Full / Part-time employment: Boehringer Ingelheim. L. Luciani: Full / Part-time employment: Boehringer Ingelheim. C. Maritaz: Full / Part-time employment: 4. Boehringer Ingelheim. C. Chouaid: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): GlaxoSmithKline; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Amgen.
Resources from the same session
5519 - Is there a difference of Palliative care problems and needs between cancer and non-cancer hospitalized elderly patients?
Presenter: Ioanna Chatzi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2505 - There is a lack of clinical research for patients with cancer in palliative care
Presenter: Marie Vinches
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5273 - Specialist Palliative Care (SPC) in Haematological Malignancy: Establishing practices in a UK Tertiary Cancer Centre (TCC)
Presenter: Emma Kedgley
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5864 - Evaluation of the relationship between the attachment styles and psychological resilience of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Fatma Bugdayci Basal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
770 - Gefitinib along with Methotrexate as palliative therapy in PS 3 and above in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer patients
Presenter: Vidya Dusi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4232 - High intensity end-of-life care in pediatrics, adolescent and young adult patients with cancer using an administrative database.
Presenter: Seiko Bun
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4845 - Embedded outpatient palliative care service within the oncology clinic: Preliminary experience in Hacettepe Oncology Hospital
Presenter: Deniz Can Guven
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3270 - Internet-based stepped care for individuals with cancer and concurrent anxiety or depression symptoms – results from a randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Birgitta Johansson
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5503 - Impact of Cognitive-Behavioral-Therapy (CBT) on levels of anxiety, depression and distress in cancer patients (pts)
Presenter: Daniela Tregnago
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5553 - Cytokine genetic variations and worse quality of life among family caregivers of head and neck cancer patients in palliative care
Presenter: Daniel Pequeno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract