Abstract 2989
Background
Past and recent findings indicate that adverse effects of chemotherapy influence the patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the implicated factors that influenced the perceived symptoms and quality of life in cancer patients during chemotherapy.
Methods
A longitudinal study was conducted in a large hospital in a major city of Northern Greece. A total of 200 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in cycle 2 and cycle 3 were participated in the research. Data was collected using Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) additionally with a questionnaire for the demographic and clinical characteristics. Descriptive and conductive statistical methods were applied.
Results
The vast majority of the participants were middle aged (58.94±9.94 years) men (n = 122, 61%) suffering from lung cancer (n = 98, 48%). Analysis based on the chemotherapy cycle status revealed a significant differences in several factors grouping the patients regarding their chemotherapy cycle status (cycle 2 vs cycle 3). Particularly, feeling nervous level, severity and distress of dizziness and the severity in the way of food tastes [p = 0.014, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively] differed statistically significantly. Moreover, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that gender (p < 0.001) and physical well-being score (p = 0.005) affected perceived symptoms in MSAS. Furthermore, gender, occupational status, diet, type of cancer and family status influenced the overall quality of life in cycle 2 patients (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively); however, in cycle 3 patients : gender (p = 0.003), occupational status (p < 0.001), educational status (p < 0.001) and diet (p < 0.001) were referred as the most statistically significant variables that influence the overall quality of life.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we demonstrate that adverse effects of chemotherapy in cancer patients play a critical role for the overall quality of patients’ life. Patients demographic or/ and clinicobiological characteristics seem to influence the appearance of the adverse effects.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract