Abstract 724
Background
Screening and management of distress are essential. The Distress thermometer (DT) is a common screening tool. However, it’s cutoff score and the accuracy properties such as sensitivity and specificity is still unclear in Chinese cancer patients.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, DT was compared against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in 784 heterogeneous cancer inpatients. The HADS cutoff score ≥15, ≥6, and ≥9 were used to define distress, anxiety, and depression respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to determine the discriminative accuracy of DT against each scale.
Results
When DT was compared against HADS-T, ROC showed an excellent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.903. The optimal cutoff score of 4 yielded sensitivity (SE)=89.3%, specificity (SP)=85.8%, positive predictive value (PPV)=89.9%, negative predictive value (NPV)=85.0%, screening utility (UI-)=.729, and case-finding utility (UI+)=.802. Furthermore, compared With HADS subscales, AUC=0.801 with a cutoff score 3 on DT optimally detected SE = 80.7%, SP = 64.5% PPV=89.4%, NPV=47.3%, UI-=.369, andUI + =.721 for anxiety and AUC=0.802 with a cutoff score of 4 on DT optimally detected SE = 88.3%, SP = 65.3%, PPV=66.4%, NPV=87.8%, UI-=.573 and UI + =.586 for depression respectively. DT Scores were moderately correlated with HADS-Total, HADS-Anxiety, andHADS-Depression. Female gender, low education level, advanced cancer stage, no exercise habit, suicidal ideation and months since diagnosis more than 12 were found to be associated with distress.
Conclusions
For Chinese patients with cancer, DT is an efficacious screening and case finding a tool for distress. Among the subscales, DT performed well in both screening and case finding for depression, however, although the case finding was good it carried a poor screening ability for anxiety.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5553 - Cytokine genetic variations and worse quality of life among family caregivers of head and neck cancer patients in palliative care
Presenter: Daniel Pequeno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4321 - Health-related quality of life of advanced melanoma survivors treated with CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition: a matched cohort study
Presenter: Annelies Boekhout
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
779 - Capecitabine vs Cisplatin along with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable lower esophageal cancers focusing on TWISTT score and QOL
Presenter: Goutham Anugu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5914 - Cancer, Mental Health and End Life Simulation (CAMhELS): A novel effectiveness evaluation.
Presenter: Asanga Fernando
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2597 - Cancer patients’ expectations and understanding about their disease
Presenter: Mónica Pinho
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5187 - Impact of patients’ death on oncologists and coping strategies: An online survey
Presenter: Soumaya Labidi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4579 - Clinical benefit from late lines of therapy offered to patients treated in a tertiary referral centre
Presenter: Andrea Sbrana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5058 - Preparedness for caregiving in caregivers of cancer patients
Presenter: Hatice Yakar
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5917 - Oncologic Emergency Medicine in the real world: A survey and proposal for improvement
Presenter: Carintia Dorta Pérez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4077 - The Reality of Critical Cancer Patients in a Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit
Presenter: Tiago Filipe Da Cruz Tomas
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract