Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Molecular sub types of breast cancer in a developing country. Classification immunohistochemical: Clinicopathologic feature and survival analysis

Date

03 May 2019

Session

Poster lunch

Presenters

Hugo Castro

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_3): iii27-iii33. 10.1093/annonc/mdz096

Authors

H.R. Castro1, L. Salazar2, L. Garcia2, N. Castro Sanchez1, P. Ramos1, K. Cruz1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Instituto Guatemalteco de Seguridad Social (IGSS), 1015 - Guatemala/GT
  • 2 Medicina Legal, Instituto Guatemalteco de Seguridad Social, 01015 - Guatemala/GT
More

Resources

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous malignancy and it’s possible to identify by inmmunohistochemistry, four subtypes with different clinical and biological behavior. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) influence of these subtypes on the Guatemalam population.

Methods

Data of 954 patients Instituto Guatemalteco de Seguridad Social treated from 2008-2014. BC subtypes were categorized in Luminal A (RE+ and/or RP+, HER2-), Luminal B (RE+ and/or RP+, HER2+ o Ki-67> 14%); HER2 (RE-, RP-, HER2+) and triple negative tumors (TNT) (RE-, RP-, HER2-).

Results

Median age was 52 years (23-95), 55% were premenopausal. We found that 522 (56%) of the cases were luminal A, 190 (20%) were triple negative tumors (TNT), luminal B were 73 (8%) and HER2-positive in 152 (20%) of cases. Nine patients (3%) had other breast cancer contralateral. In 438 (70%) of all the cases were found in locally advanced stages (IIB–IIIC); 773 (81%) patients underwent radical mastectomy and 181 (19%) undergoing conservative surgery. We have found in the univariate analysis the following statistically significant variables for DFS: clinical stage (I – IIa vs IIb – IIIC; 88% vs 70%; p = 0.001), nuclear grade (grade 1, 2 vs 3; 83% vs 62%; p = 0.001) and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (total vs other response; 76% vs 54%; p = 0.001), and status Her-2 subtype was borderline (positive vs negative; p = 0.079). Clinical stage (p = 0.05), histologic grade (P = 0.45), response to neoadjuvant (p = 0.01) as significant factors of prognosis for the OS. The OS by molecular subtype were Luminal A (94%), Luminal B (75%), HER2 (79%) and TNT (68%), (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The prevalence of molecular subtypes of BC is similar to reported internationally. In Guatemala the majority of patients with BC are diagnosed in advanced stage.

Editorial acknowledgement

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Hugo Castro.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings