Abstract 342P
Background
Palonosetron (PALO) is a second generation 5HT-3 receptor antagonist recommended as a preferred drug for high-emetogenic chemotherapies. PALO 0.25 mg has been reported to be as effective as 0.75 mg with less adverse events, such as constipation, when used alone or in combination with dexamethasone (DEX). The efficacy and safety of PALO 0.25 mg compared to 0.75 mg in combination with aprepitant (APR) plus DEX in patients (pts) with esophageal cancer remain unclear.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of PALO 0.25 mg versus 0.75 mg in combination with APR plus DEX in pts with localized or metastatic esophageal cancer who received cisplatin (CDDP)-containing chemotherapy between Nov. 2015 and Mar. 2017 at our institution. Complete response was defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication use.
Results
This study enrolled 58 and 55 pts who received PALO 0.25 mg and 0.75 mg. The baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. Sixteen (28%) and 24 (44%) pts received triplet regimen (docetaxel, CDDP and 5-fluorouracil), respectively. The complete response rates were 72% for 0.25 mg and 62% for 0.75 mg, with no significant difference (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, p = 0.23). Percentages of no nausea was also similar with 40% and 33%, respectively (OR = 0.74, p = 0.44). Grade 2-3 constipation and any grade of aspartate aminotransferase increase were more frequently observed in 0.75 mg group (38% vs. 58%, p < 0.05; 7% vs. 22%, p < 0.05). In univariate and multivariate analyses, no association between baseline characteristics, including dose of PALO, and complete response rate was observed. Meanwhile, PALO 0.75 mg, older age, localized disease, and tobacco consumption were significantly associated with grade 2 or more constipation (OR = 0.28, p < 0.01; OR = 0.28, p < 0.01; OR = 3.09, p < 0.05; OR = 0.27, p < 0.05).
Conclusions
PALO 0.25 mg in combination with APR plus DEX may contributed to the decrease in constipation in pts with esophageal cancer who received CDDP-containing chemotherapy without compromising the anti-emetic effect compared to 0.75 mg.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
National Cancer Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
Y. Nakamura: Research grant/Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical. H. Taniguchi: Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Lilly Japan; Honoraria (self): Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self): MBL; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma; Honoraria (self): Nippon Kayaku; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sumitomo-Dainippon Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Array BioPharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD Oncology; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sysmex. T. Kojima: Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant/Funding (institution): Astellas Amgen BioPharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugaiseiyaku; Research grant/Funding (institution): Parexel; Research grant/Funding (institution): Shionogi; Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Advisory/Consultancy: Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Oncolys BioPharma. T. Yoshino: Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugai; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Research grant/Funding (institution): Parexel International; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
312P - Identification of neoantigen-specific T cell response and anti-tumour immunity in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxiao Du
Session: e-Poster Display Session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session