Abstract 374P
Background
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is an autoimmune disorder that causes a persistent inflammatory condition that affects the oral mucosa. The precise cause of OLP is unknown, however it is thought to be a combination of genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and immunological dysregulation. Oral lichen planus is classified as a potentially oral malignant lesion (POML) because it has the potential to develop into oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC).
Methods
34 individuals with OLP were followed for three years in this prospective clinic-histologic investigation. Tissue samples from these patients were immunohistochemically and histomorphometrically examined for CD34 and CD105 (Endoglin). The patients received routine oral preventive therapy at three-month intervals and were followed for up to three years. The possibility for a malignant transformation was evaluated clinically, and in the event of clinical suspicion, a repeat biopsy was undertaken to rule out malignancy.
Results
The clinical and histological parameters were analyzed using the paired 't' test with the assumption of normal distribution and with an appropriate sample size of 34. During the three-year follow-up period, 73% (n=25/34) of the total patients never developed oral cancer. OSCC was the most typically found, with the Gingivo-Buccal Sulcus area being the most prevalent site. The mean Vascular Caliber (VC) utilizing CD 34 and CD 105 (μm2) in PMOL was 8.5 ± 2.0 μm2 and 5.4 ± 1.2 μm2, respectively. The mean VC - CD 34 and CD105 did differ statistically (p-value<0.05). It has been reported that patients with 'erosive' OLP had a higher malignant transformation potential (n=09/34) and higher levels of CD34 and CD105 than patients without malignant transformation (p-value<0.01).
Conclusions
CD 34 and CD105 markers were found to be beneficial in predicting the malignant transformation potential of Erosive OLP when utilized in evaluating micro vessel density and vessel morphometry. This suggests that CD34 and CD105 may be useful immunohistological indicators for assessing the early stage of malignant transformation potential in POMLs, particularly OLP, well before 3.0 years. As a result, CD34 and Endoglin are being recommended as IHC Panel Markers for determining OLP prognosis.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract