Abstract 605
Background
The efficacy of oxaliplatin containing regimens were confirmed in large randomized phase III trials in which they were superior to fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant setting for patients with stage III colon cancer. In Japan, not only medical oncologists but also surgeons practice chemotherapy. In this analysis, we investigated differences in safety and efficacy between surgeons and medical oncologists from NORTH/HGCSG1003 study.
Methods
NORTH/HGCSG1003 is a multicenter phase II study. This study enrolled patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Patients received FOLFOX4 or mFOLFOX6 repeated every 2 weeks for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, safety, RDI and so on. In this analysis, pts characteristics and safety were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Dose intensity was compared using Student's t-test, and DFS and RFS using log-rank test.
Results
From September 2010 to March 2013, 273 patients at 28 institutions were enrolled. In the eligible population (n = 264), 159 patients were treated with chemotherapy by medical oncologists (group O) and 105 patients by surgeons (group S). Patients’ characteristics between two groups were well balanced except for bowel obstruction before surgery (8.8 % in group O vs 23.8% in group S; p = 0.001). Median RDI (group O vs group S) of oxaliplatin was 0.631 vs 0.751 (p < 0.001) and that of bolus 5-FU was 0.638 vs 0.797 (p < 0.001). The difference in completion treatment rate of 12 cycles between two group was not statistically significant (83.6% vs 76.2%; p = 0.153). 3y DFS rate was 75.3% in group O and 74.9% in group S (HR 0.976, p = 0.919). 3y RFS rate was 75.9% in group O and 78.8% in group S (HR 0.888, p = 0.643).
Conclusions
RDI of oxaliplatin and bolus 5-FU were significantly lower in group O than group S. The frequency of platelet count decreased (all grade) was significantly less in O. This was presumed to be because the RDI of oxaliplatin was significantly lower in O. However, there was no significant difference in the frequency of peripheral sensory neuropathy. There was no significant difference in efficacy between O and S.
Editorial acknowledgement
Clinical trial identification
UMIN000004590, 2011/01/15.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Non-profit Organization: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group.
Funding
Non-profit Organization: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group.
Disclosure
S. Yuki: Honoraria: Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd. Y. Komatsu: Research Funding Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
161 - Concurrent nivolumab and radiotherapy in treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Dai Wee Lee
Session: Poster display - Cocktail
Resources:
Abstract
399 - Adenocarcinoma lung with sphenoidal metastasis
Presenter: Manoj Behera
Session: Poster display - Cocktail
Resources:
Abstract
617 - Osimertinib in the Treatment of Leptomeningeal Disease in T790M-negative, EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A Case Report
Presenter: Lawrence Kasherman
Session: Poster display - Cocktail
Resources:
Abstract
636 - Hemodynamic instability caused by cardiac metastases of non-small cell lung cancer- case studies
Presenter: Chia-I Shen
Session: Poster display - Cocktail
Resources:
Abstract
1302 - The long term survival of a 78 year old female diagnosed with Malignant Epithelial Mesothelioma with peritoneal disease on Pembrolizumab plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin: a case report
Presenter: Katherine Ruth Oracion
Session: Poster display - Cocktail
Resources:
Abstract