Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display - Cocktail

598 - Most clinically approved anti-EGFR antibodies fail to neutralize EGFRvIII, leading to lack of anti-tumour efficacy in high grade glioma

Date

24 Nov 2018

Session

Poster display - Cocktail

Presenters

Sameer Greenall

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_9): ix21-ix22. 10.1093/annonc/mdy429

Authors

S. Greenall1, T. Adams2, T. Johns3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Monash University, 3800 - Clayton/AU
  • 2 Manufacturing, CSIRO, 3052 - Parkville/AU
  • 3 Cancer Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, 6008 - Subiaco/AU
More

Resources

Abstract 598

Background

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its truncated autoactive form, EGFRvIII, are amplified/overexpressed in 60% and 30% of gliomas, respectively, and are integral to gliomagenesis. Several antibodies have been developed to neutralise the activity of these two receptors; however, promising pre-clinical data has not translated to clinical success for unknown reasons, with cetuximab (phase II) and nimotuzumab (phase III) failing to improve patient outcomes.

Methods

To investigate reasons for this, we analysed EGFRvIII-bearing primary neurosphere cell lines after antibody treatment using conventional and native western for EGFR/EGFRvIII status, proliferation assays, immunofluorescence assays and in vivo orthotopic tumour models.

Results

We report that several clinical and pre-clinical antibodies (cetuximab, nimotuzumab, necitumumab and matuzumab) do not neutralise EGFRvIII auto-activity, leading to sustained cellular proliferation. The antibody ch806 neutralised EGFRvIII but not wtEGFR. Only panitumumab neutralised both EGFRvIII and wtEGFR, resulting in superior anti-proliferative effects and nullification of downstream signalling. Tracking of fluorescent panitumumab and western blotting demonstrated that anti-EGFR antibodies do not degrade either wtEGFR or EGFRvIII as previously thought – rather, the receptors are internalised and then recycled. Mechanistically, panitumumab’s unique avidity allows stable complex formation with EGFRvIII to prevent its activation whilst ch806 binds to EGFRvIII and retards the formation of the dimeric, active form of EGFRvIII. In orthotopic in vivo trials, panitumumab induced a significantly greater increase in survival compared to cetuximab, nimotuzumab, ch806 or a combination of ch806 and cetuximab.

Conclusions

Collectively, our research has discovered a previously unknown failure of most FDA-approved and pre-clinical anti-EGFR antibodies to neutralise EGFRvIII. Panitumumab as a single agent is vastly superior in vitro and in appropriate primary GBM in vivo orthograft models. These results suggest that panitumumab may offer an effective candidate for a further clinical trial in an EGFRvIII-positive patient population.

Editorial acknowledgement

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Amgen.

Disclosure

T. Johns: Funding Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings